Skip to main content
Download PDF

Periaortic adipose radiomics texture features associated with increased coronary calcium score—first results on a photon-counting-CT

BMC Medical Imaging volume 23, Article number: 97 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cardiovascular diseases remain the world’s primary cause of death. The identification and treatment of patients at risk of cardiovascular events thus are as important as ever. Adipose tissue is a classic risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, has been linked to systemic inflammation, and is suspected to contribute to vascular calcification. To further investigate this issue, the use of texture analysis of adipose tissue using radiomics features could prove a feasible option.

Methods

In this retrospective single-center study, 55 patients (mean age 56, 34 male, 21 female) were scanned on a first-generation photon-counting CT. On axial unenhanced images, periaortic adipose tissue surrounding the thoracic descending aorta was segmented manually. For feature extraction, patients were divided into three groups, depending on coronary artery calcification (Agatston Score 0, Agatston Score 1–99, Agatston Score ≥ 100). 106 features were extracted using pyradiomics. R statistics was used for statistical analysis, calculating mean and standard deviation with Pearson correlation coefficient for feature correlation. Random Forest classification was carried out for feature selection and Boxplots and heatmaps were used for visualization. Additionally, monovariable logistic regression predicting an Agatston Score > 0 was performed, selected features were tested for multicollinearity and a 10-fold cross-validation investigated the stability of the leading feature.

Results

Two higher-order radiomics features, namely “glcm_ClusterProminence” and “glcm_ClusterTendency” were found to differ between patients without coronary artery calcification and those with coronary artery calcification (Agatston Score ≥ 100) through Random Forest classification. As the leading differentiating feature “glcm_ClusterProminence” was identified.

Conclusion

Changes in periaortic adipose tissue texture seem to correlate with coronary artery calcium score, supporting a possible influence of inflammatory or fibrotic activity in perivascular adipose tissue. Radiomics features may potentially aid as corresponding biomarkers in the future.

Peer Review reports

Background

As cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are still the world's leading cause of death [1], identifying and treating patients at risk of ischemic events remains a vital task of modern medicine. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is an important risk factor for CVD, which is why the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) has proven to be a reliable marker for risk stratification of corresponding patients [2]. In daily practice, the Agatston Score is used for estimating the extent of CAC differentiated to main coronary arteries [3]. Depending on the severity of calcifications and hence the Agatston Score, the probability for the development of an obstructive coronary artery disease event can be estimated, outlining a cut-off value of 100 as a reference point for the occurrence of most coronary events such as myocardial infarction and death [4].

Another important influence are various adipose tissues, which have traditionally been linked to multiple other cardiovascular risk factors [5]. In several studies, these were found to contribute to systemic inflammation [6] and were correlated to atherosclerosis [6,7,8]. Especially intrathoracic, periaortic (PAAT), and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) were linked to vascular calcification [6,7,8], suggesting possible local toxic effects on the vasculature [8].

In most studies, adipose tissue was examined mainly in terms of volume [5,6,7,8,9] and density [10,11,12], hence there is little data on tissue characteristics, especially from PAAT and EAT. A possible way to address this issue could be the use of texture analysis.

Radiomics is a rapidly evolving field of medical imaging, analyzing pixel-based information within the image beyond the natural limitations of the examiner's eye. These so-called features are quantitative metrics regarding various characteristics of the region/volume of interest (ROI/VOI) such as shape and texture and may, either alone or in correlation with further patient data, help to solve diagnostic challenges or even serve as prognostic biomarkers [13]. Radiomics features are mineable, meaning with a sufficiently large database, new features may be discovered as potential markers or patterns of certain lesions or diseases [14].

While radiomics is already well established in oncology research [13, 15], the use of radiomics in cardiac imaging, and therefore its application regarding EAT and PAAT is still in its early stages [16]. Thus, the amount of data on radiomics features in cardiovascular imaging is still relatively small. However, initial studies on the use of radiomics in this area suggest possible benefits [17].

For higher accuracy in radiomics features, a silicon-based photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) offers an alternative to conventional energy-integrating computed tomography (EICT) due to improved spatial resolution [18]. PCCT is a ground-breaking technology that has been shown to improve the quality of computed tomography (CT) imaging and allows a higher contrast-to-noise ratio and a higher spatial resolution [19]. This novel technology has the chance to overcome the limitations of texture analysis by increased spatial resolution and may pave the way for a sufficient analysis of PAAT.

Hence, this study aims to investigate a possible correlation between the extent of CAC and PAAT texture features on PCCT images and possibly find a potential biomarker for the diffuse inflammatory reaction of PAAT leading to coronary artery sclerosis.

Methods

Study design

For this retrospective single-center study patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) and clinically indicated electrocardiography (ECG)-gated cardiac CT were enrolled between December 2021 and March 2022. Patients were excluded in case of severe image artifacts, i.e. motion artifacts (n = 3), or in case of previous cardiac stent implantation (n = 5). The patient population was screened for metal artifacts arising from i.e. dorsal spinal fusion (n = 0) or pacemaker device (n = 0) and for potential mass or visible tissue inhomogeneities affecting the PAAT (n = 0). The study had an institutional review board and local ethics committee approval (ID 2021–659, Ethikkomission II, Heidelberg University).

Patient collective and cardiac CT imaging protocol

Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 55 patients (34 male, 21 female, mean age 56 years, range: 20–80 years) were enrolled in this study. All included 55 patients were scanned on a first-generation whole-body dual-source PCCT system (NAEOTOM Alpha; Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany). For examination, a prospective ECG-gated sequential mode with a tube voltage of 120 kV and automatic dose modulation with a CARE keV BQ setting of 64 was used. Effective gantry rotation time was 0.25 s. In correlation to heart rate and in absence of contraindications, patients received 5–10 mg of metoprolol intravenously to lower heart rates sufficiently. Additionally, patients received, in absence of contraindication, 0.4–0.8 mg nitroglycerin. For evaluation of CAC, all patients underwent a non-contrast-enhanced cardiac CT. This scan was followed by a contrast-enhanced scan of the coronary arteries using 80 ml of iodine contrast (Imeron 400, Bracco Imaging Deutschland GmbH, Konstanz, Germany) and 20 ml saline chaser (NaCl 0,9%) with a weight-based flow rate of 4–5 ml/sec via antecubital venous access.

Cardiac CT imaging analysis

Axial non-enhanced images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 2 mm (increment 2 mm) using a soft vascular kernel (Bv40). This data was anonymized, exported, and stored in digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) file format. DICOM files were converted to Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative (NIFTI) file format for utilization with a dedicated segmentation tool (3D Slicer, Version 4.11) [20]. PAAT surrounding the descending thoracic aorta was segmented manually with a threshold of -195/-45 Hounsfield units (HU) [21] by a medical student and reviewed by a board-certified radiologist with 9 years of clinical experience in cardiovascular imaging. The segmentation included a rectangle of adipose tissue defined by the esophagus as the ventral border and the costovertebral angle as the dorsal border as recommended by Turkem et al. [22], shown in Fig. 1. The cranial border for segmentation was set at the pulmonary trunk and extended over 8 cm downward. Additionally, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated for EAT by defining a specific ROI next to the right coronary artery (RCA). Mean HU was divided through standard deviation (SD) within the ROI.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Segmentation of the periaortic thoracic adipose tissue (PAAT) was performed on axial view with a slice thickness of 2 mm (green area, left side) building a segmentation tube around the descending aorta (green area, coronal view, right side)

Full size image

Calcium scoring was performed by a radiologist with 9 years of experience in cardiac imaging on axial non-enhanced scans with 3 mm slice thickness and a quantitative Qr36 kernel using dedicated software (syngo.via, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany) for the calculation of the Agatston Score. Afterward, the study population was split up into three different groups depending on the severity of CAC: patients with no sign of CAC (Agatston Score 0), patients with Agatston Scores between 1—99, and patients with Agatston Scores ≥ 100. The cut-off value of 100 was chosen in line with the literature, as this is associated with a significant increase in the development of coronary events [4, 23].

Radiomics feature extraction and statistical analysis

Features for the PAAT regions of interest were further extracted using a dedicated imaging biomarker standardization initiative definition (IBSI)-based python package (pyradiomics, version 3.0.1.) [24]. For each patient enrolled in this study first-order features and second-order features, namely grey level co-occurrence matrix (glcm), grey level dependence matrix (gldm), grey level size zone matrix (glszm), grey level run length matrix (glrlm), and neighbouring grey tone difference matrix (ngtdm) were extracted.

All statistical analyses were performed in R [25] and RStudio (version 1.3.1093, Boston, MA, USA) [26]. For all quantitative parameters mean and SD were calculated, categorical variables were summarized as percentages. Normalization of all radiomics features was achieved using z-score:

$$\mathrm{z}=((\mathrm{X}-\upmu ))/\upsigma ,$$

with µ being the mean and σ the feature SD. Pearson correlation coefficients were used for the correlation of feature calculation. Features were visualized in boxplots and heatmaps using the ComplexHeatmap Package in R. Hierarchical clustering was performed within each Agatston Score Group. A permutation-based Random Forest (RF) classifier was applied with the Boruta package for R for feature selection by the calculation of feature importance. For group comparisons, student’s t-test was performed, and for multiple-group comparisons, ANOVA was performed. Additionally, monovariable logistic regression predicting an Agatston Score > 0 was performed. Furthermore, relevant features were investigated for multicollinearity, and a 10-fold cross-validation was performed for the leading feature.

Results

Patient and image characteristics

The patient’s characteristics depending on the severity of CAC are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient collective overview. Mean and (SD) given for continuous variables
Full size table

For all patients, SNR was calculated as described in the material and method section, mean SNR for the EAT of our patient group was 3.82.

For all patients, the mean HU value of the whole segmentation was determined (Agatston Score 0: -97,97 HU, Agatston Score 1–99: -101,69 HU, Agatston Score ≥ 100: -100,38 HU). Additionally, the volume of the PAAT in all three patient populations was quantified as outlined in Table 2. Clinical data were retrospectively evaluated, hence only in 25 out of 55 patients cardiovascular risk factors could be determined (Table 2).

Table 2 Conventional and clinical patients’ parameters. Mean and (SD) given for continuous variables
Full size table

Cluster analysis

Hierarchical clustering of the radiomics features extracted from the PAAT of every patient was performed after standardization, as well as clustering within each Agatston Score group. These results were demonstrated in a heatmap (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Unsupervised cluster heatmap of aggregated radiomics features of periaortic adipose tissue (PAAT)

Full size image

Feature selection

Important features for differentiation based on the PAAT texture were selected by Boruta feature selection: RF-based feature selection was performed on the Agatston Score groups Agatston 0 and Agatston ≥ 100. In the process, out of 106 features, two second-order features, namely “original_glcm_ClusterTendency” and “original_glcm_ClusterProminence”, were identified as features associated with a difference in Agatston Score (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Random Forest (RF) feature selection in the 36 patients of the validation set (differentiating features marked in green)

Full size image

Internal validation

For internal validation, the aforementioned features were additionally investigated in the group of Agatston Score 1–99. The corresponding radiomics features are shown as boxplots in Fig. 4 and summarized in Table 3.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Distribution of “original_glcm_ClusterProminance” and “original_glcm_ClusterTendency” features within the dataset (orange = Agatston Score ≥ 100, green = Agatston Score 1–99, blue = Agatston Score 0)

Full size image
Table 3 Differentiating higher order radiomics features. Mean and (SD) given for continuous variables
Full size table

Supporting the expected change of texture in PAAT with an increasing Agatston Score, the Agatston Score 1–99 group was placed in between the two other groups, resulting in the respective mean values (Agatston Score 0/1–99/ ≥ 100) of 92.77/79.23/77.05 for “original_glcm_ClusterProminence” (p = 0.019) and 5.72/5.33/5.24 for “original_glcm_ClusterTendency” (p = 0.078).

Internal cross-validation and assessment for multicollinearity

To investigate the association of the variables “original_glcm_ClusterProminence” and “original_glcm_ClusterTendency” with an increased Agatston Score, additional monovariable, logistic regressions predicting an Agatston Score of > 0 were performed. The corresponding results are shown in Table 4.

Table 4 Logistic regression for prediction of Agatston Score > 0
Full size table

To assess for multicollinearity, Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) was calculated and resulted in a value of 7.9269, indicating multicollinearity. The association of both variables is visualized in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Association of variables “original_glcm_ClusterProminence” and “original_glcm_ClusterTendency”

Full size image

As a result, the variable “original_glcm_ClusterProminence” was selected for the final model. A ten-fold cross-validation of the logistic regression was performed to investigate its stability. This resulted in a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.4528, a R-squared value of 0.3677, and a mean absolute error of 0.4220.

Discussion

This study is the first to investigate the possible connection between CAC and PAAT texture changes using radiomics features on PCCT. Two features, “original_glcm_ClusterTendency” and “original_glcm_ClusterProminence”, were found to differ between different levels of CAC (Agatston Score 0/1–99/ ≥ 100). Due to the multicollinearity of the two features, “original_glcm_ClusterProminence” was selected as the leading feature, offering a potential radiomics signature for inflammatory or fibrotic changes in PAAT. “ClusterProminence” can be used as a marker for skewness and asymmetry of gray level co-occurrence matrix features. In analyses, a higher value implies more asymmetry about the mean [27]. Our study showed significantly higher values of “ClusterProminence” in the patient group without CAC (Agatston Score 0), indicating a higher asymmetry of grey values in PAAT. A possible explanation could be that diffuse fibrotic or inflammatory changes lead to a more homogenous structure, although this cannot be proven through this study. However, as adipose tissue and its inflammatory reactions have been linked to vascular calcification [6] and possible local effects [8], these preliminary findings may support the possible correlation between PAAT texture and the calcification of coronary arteries.

The correlation between adipose tissue density and cardiovascular risk factors or atherosclerosis is disputed. While there are findings on lower CT attenuation in visceral and subcutaneous fat correlating with lower risks of atherosclerosis [11], there are also findings suggesting lower density in abdominal fat to correlate with greater cardiometabolic risks [28]. The data of this study cannot follow either of these findings, as we were unable to find a significant difference in PAAT density between the three groups.

In 2010 Lehman et al. investigated a possible connection between PAAT, metabolic risk factors, and vascular calcification by quantifying PAAT and found it to be associated with CAC as well as aortic calcification [7]. Efe et al. investigated the relationship between PAAT and pericardial adipose tissue with CAD in 2014, based on PAAT and pericardial adipose tissue volume measurements. Patients were divided into two groups for PAAT (PAAT < / ≥ 24.3 cm3) and pericardial adipose tissue (< / ≥ 157.7cm3) respectively. In both groupings, the groups with higher PAAT/ pericardial adipose tissue volume had a significantly higher prevalence of CAD. [29]. Coming to a similar conclusion, Zhu et al. investigated the association of PAAT and visceral adipose tissue with coronary artery atherosclerosis in 2021, using a volume-based approach. They found PAAT volume to be significantly associated with CAD and coronary artery atherosclerosis [30]. In line with these results, the PAAT volume in this study's population did also differ significantly (p = 0.031) between the group with an Agatston Score of 0 and the groups with an Agatston Score ≥ 1. However, there was no significant difference in PAAT volume between the two groups with Agatston Score 1–99 (mean 89429.63 mm3) and Agatston Score ≥ 100 (mean 87601.91 mm3) and hence no linear correlation between CAC severity and PAAT volume could be found. The feature "original_glcm_ClusterProminence" did show a significant difference between all three groups, declining with increasing Agatston Score. This may imply that radiomics features could potentially aid in differentiating between the severities of CAC when a volume-based approach reaches its limitations.

In 2011 Yun et al. found adipose tissue to strongly correlate with systemic inflammation and cardiovascular risk factors when investigating a connection between pericardial fat, thoracic PAAT, and cardiovascular risk factors, as well as their value in terms of CAC. Additionally, they found pericardial fat to exert a role in CAC [6]. This supports the findings of Rosito et al. in 2008 when they found intrathoracic and pericardial fat to be associated with vascular calcification [8].

The possible connection between PAAT and vascular calcification was further supported by the findings of Tharmaseelan et al. in 2022. They investigated the correlation between abdominal PAAT and local aortic calcification by dividing 30 patients into two groups (aortic calcification present/absent) and extracting radiomics features of the abdominal PAAT. They found several abdominal PAAT radiomics texture features to be significantly associated with local aortic calcification [31], even though the significant features in their study differ from our results. A possible explanation could be that in contrast to investigating abdominal PAAT depending on local aortic calcifications, our study goes one step further and outlines a possible influence of thoracic PAAT not on local aortic calcifications but on CAC, indicating a possible more diffuse and not only local inflammatory or fibrotic process.

The results of this study must be interpreted in consideration of the following limitations. The presented study is retrospective and was performed at a single center with a limited number of patients, due to strict selection criteria and the limited number of patients who were scanned with the newly established PCCT. However, the use of a PCCT led to increased image quality and possibly more precise texture analysis. Furthermore, one severe limitation is that only insufficient clinical data were available for this study, as many patients were scanned in an outpatient setting as well as due to the retrospective nature of this study. This has to be addressed in further studies in the future. The cardiovascular risk factor “hypertension” differed significantly between the three patient groups, as did the general distribution of recorded cardiovascular risk factors, resulting in potentially contributing confounders. However, this was present mostly in the Agatston Score group 1–99 with a decrease in the patient group Agatston Score ≥ 100. This does not reflect the statistical analysis of the radiomics features, as the features present a straight falling intensity with rising CAC. Moreover, the gender distribution within the group of Agatston Score ≥ 100 is uneven, with 86% male patients, as well as the age distribution between the different Agatston Score groups, so a more balanced age and gender distribution will be needed in further investigations, preferring a prospective multicenter approach in the future with a larger patient population with sufficient clinical data. Lastly, as pointed out by Ayx et al., these results may not be fully comparable to any similar observations on EICT scanners, as their data suggest differences in radiomics feature values, especially in higher-order features such as the aforementioned ones, between EICT and PCCT scanners [32]. An additional study comparing PAAT in patients scanned on EICT and PCCT must follow in the future to address these severe limitations. Furthermore, radiomics analysis of PAAT should be performed using different reconstruction algorithms to address the limited reproducibility in our preliminary study.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study is the first to investigate and outline a possible correlation between PAAT texture and coronary artery sclerosis. This may allow the hypothesis of possible texture changes through inflammatory or fibrotic processes in perivascular adipose tissue influencing the process of arteriosclerosis, as well as suggesting that radiomics features may potentially serve as biomarkers for such respective changes.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CAC:

Coronary artery calcification

CACS:

Coronary artery calcium score

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CT:

Computed tomography

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

DICOM:

Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine

EAT:

Epicardial adipose tissue

ECG:

Electrocardiography

EICT:

Energy-Integrating computed tomography

GLCM:

Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix

GLDM:

Grey Level Dependence Matrix

GLRLM:

Grey Level Run Length Matrix

GLSZM:

Grey Level Size Zone Matrix

HU:

Hounsfield units

IBSI:

Imaging biomarker standardization initiative definition

NGTDM:

Neighbouring Grey Tone Difference Matrix

NIFTI:

Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative

PAAT:

Periaortic adipose tissue

PCCT:

Photon-Counting computed tomography

RCA:

Right coronary artery

RF:

Random Forest

RMSE:

Root Mean Squared Error

ROI:

Region of Interest

SD:

Standard deviation

SNR:

Signal-to-noise Ratio

VOI:

Volume of Interest

VIF:

Variance Inflation Factor

References

  1. The top 10 causes of death, WHO. 2020, https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death Accessed 19 Aug 2022.

  2. Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, Pratt CM, Mahmarian AC, Frias ME, et al. Value of CACS compared with ETT and myocardial perfusion imaging for predicting long-term cardiac outcome in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients at low risk for coronary disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(2):134–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, Bild DE, Burke G, Folsom AR, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(13):1336–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, Budoff M, Blaha MJ, Post WS, Kronmal RA, et al. 10-year coronary heart disease risk prediction using coronary artery calcium and traditional risk factors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(15):1643–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Pou KM, Maurovich-Horvat P, Liu CY, et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2007;116(1):39–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yun CH, Lin TY, Wu YJ, Liu CC, Kuo JY, Yeh HI, et al. Pericardial and thoracic peri-aortic adipose tissues contribute to systemic inflammation and calcified coronary atherosclerosis independent of body fat composition, anthropometric measures and traditional cardiovascular risks. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(4):749–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lehman SJ, Massaro JM, Schlett CL, O’Donnell CJ, Hoffmann U, Fox CS. Peri-aortic fat, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and aortic calcification: the Framingham Heart Study. Atherosclerosis. 2010;210(2):656–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosito GA, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Ruberg FL, Mahabadi AA, Vasan RS, et al. Pericardial fat, visceral abdominal fat, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and vascular calcification in a community-based sample: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117(5):605–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang IC, Park HE, Choi SY. Epicardial adipose tissue contributes to the development of non-calcified coronary plaque: a 5-year computed tomography follow-up study. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017;24(3):262–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shields KJ, El Khoudary SR, Ahearn JM, Manzi S. Association of aortic perivascular adipose tissue density with aortic calcification in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Atherosclerosis. 2017;262:55–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alvey NJ, Pedley A, Rosenquist KJ, Massaro JM, O’Donnell CJ, Hoffmann U, et al. Association of fat density with subclinical atherosclerosis. JAHA. 2014;3(4):e000788.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenquist KJ, Pedley A, Massaro JM, Therkelsen KE, Murabito JM, Hoffmann U, et al. Visceral and subcutaneous fat quality and cardiometabolic risk. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(7):762–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang Y, Liu Z, He L, Chen X, Pan D, Ma Z, et al. Radiomics signature: a potential biomarker for the prediction of disease-free survival in early-stage (I or II) non—small cell lung cancer. Radiology. 2016;281(3):947–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayerhoefer ME, Materka A, Langs G, Häggström I, Szczypiński P, Gibbs P, et al. Introduction to radiomics. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(4):488–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Woźnicki P, Westhoff N, Huber T, Riffel P, Froelich MF, Gresser E, et al. Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer characterization: combined use of radiomics model with PI-RADS and clinical parameters. Cancers. 2020;12(7):1767.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ponsiglione A, Stanzione A, Cuocolo R, Ascione R, Gambardella M, De Giorgi M, et al. Cardiac CT and MRI radiomics: systematic review of the literature and radiomics quality score assessment. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(4):2629–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eslami P, Parmar C, Foldyna B, Scholtz JE, Ivanov A, Zeleznik R, et al. Radiomics of coronary artery calcium in the Framingham heart study. Radiology. 2020;2(1):e190119.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma S, Pal D, Abadi E, Sauer T, Segars P, Hsieh J, et al. Can photon-counting CT improve estimation accuracy of morphological radiomics features? A simulation study for assessing the quantitative benefits from improved spatial resolution in deep silicon-based photon-counting CT. Acad Radiol. 2023;30(6):1153–63.

  19. Willemink MJ, Persson M, Pourmorteza A, Pelc NJ, Fleischmann D. Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects. Radiology. 2018;289(2):293–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1323–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Brinkley TE, Leng X, Chughtai HL, Nicklas BJ, Kritchevsky SB, Ding J, et al. Periaortic fat and cardiovascular risk: a comparison of high-risk older adults and age-matched healthy controls. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014;38(11):1397–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Turkmen K, Ozbek O, Kayrak M, Samur C, Guler I, Tonbul HZ. Peri-aortic fat tissue thickness in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 2013;33(3):316–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Authors/Task Force Members, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), ESC National Cardiac Societies. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis. 2019;290:140–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, Hosny A, Aucoin N, Narayan V, et al. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res. 2017;77(21):e104–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. R Core Team, R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  26. RStudio Team. RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Boston: RStudio, PBC; 2020. http://www.rstudio.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Haralick R, Shanmugan K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics. 1973;SMC-3(6):610–21.

  28. Lee JJ, Pedley A, Hoffmann U, Massaro JM, Keaney JF, Vasan RS, et al. Cross-Sectional Associations of Computed Tomography (CT)-derived adipose tissue density and adipokines: the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(3):e002545.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Efe D, Aygün F, Ulucan Ş, Keser A. Relationship of coronary artery disease with pericardial and periaortic adipose tissue and their volume detected by MSCT. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2015;56(1):44–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu J, Yang Z, Li X, Chen X, Pi J, Zhuang T, et al. Association of periaortic fat and abdominal visceral fat with coronary artery atherosclerosis in Chinese middle aged and elderly patients undergoing computed tomography coronary angiography. Global Heart. 2021;16(1):74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tharmaseelan H, Froelich MF, Nörenberg D, Overhoff D, Rotkopf LT, Riffel P, et al. Influence of local aortic calcification on periaortic adipose tissue radiomics texture features—a primary analysis on PCCT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;38(11):2459–67. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10554-022-02656-2 [cited 18 Jul 2022].

  32. Ayx I, Tharmaseelan H, Hertel A, Nörenberg D, Overhoff D, Rotkopf LT, et al. Comparison study of myocardial radiomics feature properties on energy-integrating and photon-counting detector CT. Diagnostics. 2022;12(5):1294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

N/A.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This project is part of the Photon-Counting Consortium Baden-Württemberg (PC3) funded by Gesundheitsstandort Baden-Württemberg. The funding body played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany

    Peter Mundt, Hishan Tharmaseelan, Alexander Hertel, Lukas T. Rotkopf, Dominik Nörenberg, Philipp Riffel, Stefan O. Schoenberg, Matthias F. Froelich & Isabelle Ayx

  2. Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Centre, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    Lukas T. Rotkopf

Authors
  1. Peter Mundt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hishan Tharmaseelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Hertel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lukas T. Rotkopf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dominik Nörenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Philipp Riffel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stefan O. Schoenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Matthias F. Froelich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Isabelle Ayx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, S.O.S. and M.F.F.; methodology, I.A. and P.M.; software, H.T. and P.M.; validation, A.H., L.T.R., and D.N.; formal analysis, M.F.F.; investigation, I.A.; resources, S.O.S.; data curation, L.T.R. and H.T.; writing—original draft preparation, P.M.; writing—review and editing, I.A., D.N. and H.T.; visualization, I.A.; supervision, S.O.S. and P.R.; project administration, S.O.S.; funding acquisition, S.O.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Ayx.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional Review Board approval was acquired for this study (ID 2021–659, Ethikkommission II, University Heidelberg). Written informed consent from all patients was acquired as part of this study. All investigations were conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

N/A.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mundt, P., Tharmaseelan, H., Hertel, A. et al. Periaortic adipose radiomics texture features associated with increased coronary calcium score—first results on a photon-counting-CT. BMC Med Imaging 23, 97 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01058-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01058-7

Keywords

BMC Medical Imaging

ISSN: 1471-2342

Contact us