Evidence synthesis in Cancer Imaging
Guest Edited by Dr Qi Yong H. Ai, Dr Valerio Di Paola, and Dr Natale Quartuccio
Collection open to submissions
Editor's highlights
Articles
-
-
Efficacy of extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma using a portable handheld device for detecting hemothorax in a low resource setting; a multicenter longitudinal study
-
Clinical study on the use of advanced magnetic resonance imaging in lupus nephritis
-
Analysis of CT signs, radiomic features and clinical characteristics for delta variant COVID-19 patients with different vaccination status
-
Agreement and correlation of abdominal skeletal muscle area measured by CT and MR imaging in cirrhotic patients
-
Age and gender specific normal values of left ventricular mass, volume and function for gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging: a cross sectional study
-
Is fasting a necessary preparation for abdominal ultrasound?
-
MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review
-
Tumor volume in subcutaneous mouse xenografts measured by microCT is more accurate and reproducible than determined by 18F-FDG-microPET or external caliper
-
CT features in abdominal tuberculosis: 20 years experience.
Aims and scope
BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
BMC Series Blog
Latest Tweets
View Twitter timeline
Your browser needs to have JavaScript enabled to view this timeline
Annual Journal Metrics
-
Citation Impact
2.795 - 2-year Impact Factor (2021)
2.822 - 5-year Impact Factor (2021)
1.192 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
0.547 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)Speed
43 days to first decision for all manuscripts (Median)
49 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only (Median)Usage
589,421 Downloads (2021)
300 Altmetric mentions (2021)
Peer-review Terminology
-
The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:
Identity transparency: Single anonymized
Reviewer interacts with: Editor
Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication