Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Technical advance
  • Open access
  • Published:

Detection of parathyroid adenomas with multiphase 4DCT: towards a true four-dimensional technique

BMC Medical Imaging volume 21, Article number: 64 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is a commonly performed examination in the management of primary hyperparathyroidism, combining three-dimensional imaging with enhancement over time as the fourth dimension. We propose a novel technique consisting of 16 different contrast phases instead of three or four different phases. The main aim of this study was to ascertain whether this protocol allows the detection of parathyroid adenomas within dose limits. Our secondary aim was to examine the enhancement of parathyroid lesions over time.

Methods

For this prospective study, we included 15 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and a positive ultrasound prior to surgery. We performed 4DCT with 16 different phases: an unenhanced phase followed by 11 consecutive arterial phases and 4 venous phases. Continuous axial scanning centered on the thyroid was performed over a fixed 8 cm or 16 cm coverage volume after the start of contrast administration.

Results

In all patients, an enlarged parathyroid lesion was demonstrated, and the mean lesion size was 13.6 mm. The mean peak arterial enhancement for parathyroid lesions was 384 Hounsfield units (HU) compared to 333 HU for the normal thyroid. No significant difference could be found. The time to peak (TTP) was significantly earlier for parathyroid adenomas than for normal thyroid tissue: 30.8 s versus 32.3 s (p value 0.008). The mean slope of increase (MSI) of the enhancement curve was significantly steeper than that of normal thyroid tissue: 29.8% versus 22.2% (p value 0.012). The mean dose length product was 890.7 mGy cm with a calculated effective dose of 6.7 mSv.

Conclusion

Our 4DCT protocol may allow better visualization of the pattern of enhancement of parathyroid lesions, as enhancement over time curves can be drawn. In this way, wash-in and wash-out of contrast in suspected lesions can be readily demonstrated. Motion artifacts are less problematic as multiple phases are available. Exposure to our proposed 4DCT technique is comparable to that for classic helical 4DCT. Careful selection of parameters (lowering kV and SNR) can help to further reduce the dose.

Peer Review reports

Background

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a common endocrine disease and is defined as hypercalcemia with increased or inappropriately normal plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH). PHPT is usually caused by benign proliferation of chief cells in a single enlarged parathyroid gland, and sometimes multiple glands can be affected. Rarely, an association can be found with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndrome [1]. The incidence of PHPT in the US is estimated at 34–120 cases per 100,000/y (women) and 13–36 cases per 100,000/y (men); women are three- to fourfold more affected than men. There is also a higher incidence in Blacks and elderly individuals (70–79y) [2]. A clinical presentation of elevated calcium levels is associated with severe osteodynia, pruritus, pathologic fractures, muscle weakness and more vague symptoms such as memory loss, concentration difficulties or depression [3]. Hypercalcemia is most commonly seen asymptomatically; however, even these “asymptomatic” patients can present skeletal deterioration and other subclinical manifestations (osteoporosis, hypercalciuria, clinically silent vertebral fractures, nephrolithiasis) [4].

In the case of an asymptomatic patient with PHPT over the age of 50 without end-organ complications, conservative treatment can be assumed [5, 6]. The only cure for the disease is surgery, with resection of the affected gland(s). Bilateral exploration of the neck is the historical standard for treatment. In recent decades, however, this procedure has been abandoned in favor of a minimally invasive surgical approach made possible only by more effective means of preoperative imaging combined with the development of rapid parathyroid hormone determination techniques [7].

Many different imaging modalities exist. The most accessible diagnostic technique is ultrasound: it is widely available at low cost and presents no adverse effects [8]. The sensitivity is very operator-dependent but can be as high as 84% in the hands of an experienced ultrasonographer [9]. Color Doppler can be used to differentiate parathyroid lesions from other cervical masses, such as lymph nodes and thyroid nodules [10]. Very small lesions (< 5 mm) can be difficult to detect. False-negative results can occur, especially in cases of ectopic glands or in the presence of a large thyroid goiter [11].

Scintigraphy has the highest reported sensitivity: 88–90% and higher when combined with SPECT/SPECT-CT, the latter providing useful anatomical detail [12]. This technique is the method of choice when ectopic localization is suspected or in patients who have undergone prior neck surgery [13].

MRI also allows for the evaluation of parathyroid disease but remains a far less available modality. Due to the lack of ionizing radiation, it can be used without hesitation to detect ectopic glands. On a 1.5 T system, the reported sensitivity of this technique is 80% [14,15,16].

Computed tomography (CT) after administration of contrast combines anatomic and functional information. By evaluation of enhancement, abnormal parathyroid glands can be detected with a sensitivity of 85.7% [17, 18]. It is considered a useful technique in cases of ectopic glands or in cases of persistence/recurrence after initial surgery. The term four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) first appeared in the literature in 2000, when Ichikawa et al. [19] suggested a four-dimensional technique with the addition of contrast dynamics to three-dimensional hepatic tumor imaging. The concept of 4DCT for the detection of parathyroid adenomas was coined in 2006 by Rodgers et al. [20]. These authors used a three-phasic approach with an unenhanced phase and arterial and venous scanning phases. Many different study protocols have been suggested by different authors over the past 15 years. An optimal timing of the arterial phase is important for detecting parathyroid adenomas: this way, wash-in of contrast can be visualized, which is suggestive of parathyroid adenomas. We reviewed the literature to determine the ideal timing of this arterial phase.

We performed a comprehensive search of the literature in the PubMed and MEDLINE electronic databases up until May 2020 using MeSH terms “4DCT” and “parathyroid” and identified 51 articles citing defining parameters of the scanning protocol. These articles are listed in Table 1 [17, 18, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68]. Taking duplicates into account, we identified 38 unique scanning protocols.

Table 1 Overview of the timing of the different scanning phases obtained via 4DCT protocols for primary hyperparathyroidism in the literature
Full size table

The timing of the different scanning phases in the literature varied: with the exception of four studies, all cited authors chose to obtain an arterial phase. The arterial images in the literature were obtained as early as 18 s and as late as 34 s after administration of contrast. In the case of 25 different studies, the arterial images were obtained 25 s after contrast administration; in 13 studies, the authors proposed scanning after 30 s. Five other authors stated that the arterial images were obtained by scanning after 25–30 s. Forty-two authors then performed arterial scanning after 25 to 30 s (identical protocols included).

The main aim of this study was to ascertain whether we could create a 4DCT protocol allowing for the detection of parathyroid adenomas using multiple added contrast phases within dose limits. Our secondary aim was to examine the enhancement of parathyroid lesions over time, determining the maximum peak enhancement of parathyroid lesions and thus suggesting an optimal window for the arterial phase(s).

Methods

For this prospective study, we included 15 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (i.e., an elevated serum level of calcium and raised levels of parathyroid hormone) and a positive ultrasound prior to surgery. This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of our hospital. All the patients were informed about the nature of the procedure as well as the risks involved (radiation, administration of iodinated contrast) and signed an approved informed consent form prior to the examination.

Patients under the legal age (18 y) were excluded. Patients who had undergone a prior surgery of the thyroid or parathyroid were also excluded. All the patients had undergone a prior US examination, as this is the standard of care for detecting parathyroid adenomas in our hospital.

Scanning was performed on a 256-slice Revolution CT (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA). The patients received a venous catheter placed in a cubital vein that was checked for patency. Their arms were placed in a neutral position alongside the body. The patient’s head was fixed in a head cradle. The sensation of contrast administration was explained to the patients, and they were instructed not to move and to avoid swallowing. Continuous axial scanning centered on the thyroid was performed over a fixed 8 cm coverage volume (100 kVp, SmartmA 10–480 mA, thickness 0.625 mm, 0.5 s rotation scanning time). Wide beam axial scanning was chosen over helical scanning to limit the dose [69]. For the last three patients, we widened the scanning range from an 8 cm volume to a 16 cm volume, covering a larger view of the upper mediastinum.

First, we obtain a nonenhanced scan (NECT). Simultaneously, contrast administration was initiated: a bolus of 90 mL Xenetix 350 mg I/mL was injected at 6 mL/s followed by a 50 mL saline flush (6 mL/s). After a delay of 20 s, 11 subsequent phases with a 2-s interphase delay were obtained (arterial phases). With a 10-s interphase delay, 4 more phases were obtained (venous phases). A schematic overview of this protocol is provided in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic overview of the different phases in our 4DCT protocol

Full size image

The images were reviewed on an Advantage Workstation VolumeShare 7 (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA). The different scan phases were deformably registered, after which the registered image data could be analyzed on a voxel-by-voxel basis, thereby retaining spatial information for the analysis.

The data were analyzed and interpreted by two senior members of the staff with 11 and 12 years of experience in the field of neuroradiology as well as head and neck radiology and perfusion imaging experience, respectively.

The following parameters were considered in the normal thyroid, parathyroid and lymph nodes. The maximum peak enhancement (HUmax) is defined as the maximum concentration of contrast agent over time and was measured in the region of interest. It is expressed in Hounsfield units (HU). The time to peak (TTP) is defined as the time at which HUmax is reached. It is expressed in seconds (s). The mean slope of increase (MSI) corresponds to the steepness of the enhancement curve of a given region of interest. It is expressed in percent (%). An overview of these different values is provided in Table 2.

Table 2 Overview of adenoma size
Full size table

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software ver. 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). For this small dataset, we assumed the absence of normality and symmetry. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate differences between values. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.020.

For the evaluation of the radiation dose, we considered the dose length product (DLP) and the effective dose (E). The DLP is a technical dose descriptor expressed in mGy.cm that represents the total radiation output of the scan. The effective dose, expressed in mSv, represents the total body dose and was calculated following current ICRP-103 guidelines [70] by using CT patient dosimetry software (CT-Expo v1.7.1, G Stamm and H Nagel, Hann-over) that considers all technical acquisition parameters of the individual scans, including the scan range. A conversion factor of 0.0075 was used.

Results

The mean age of the included patients was 61 years. Six patients were male; nine patients were female. In all the patients, a single enlarged parathyroid could be detected, coinciding with ultrasound findings and surgical localization. The mean lesion size was 13.6 mm. The mean peak arterial enhancement for parathyroid lesions was 384 HU compared to 333 HU for the normal thyroid. No significant difference could be found between these values.

The different phases were reviewed side-by-side, as demonstrated in Fig. 2. In this example, we identified a parathyroid adenoma posterior to the left thyroid lobe in close relation to the common carotid artery. The different phases were also reviewed in absolute relation to their timing. This allowed us to plot the various phases on a curve depicting enhancement over time, as demonstrated in Fig. 3. In the example shown, arterial wash-in and venous wash-out of a suspected parathyroid adenoma were demonstrated with ease. Motion artifacts due to swallowing were present on a single phase in this specific example, affecting the curve of the small parathyroid lesion (34 s after administration of contrast).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Axial images at the level of the thyroid at different time intervals. Scans at 0–20–22–24–26–28–30–32–34–36–38–40 s after administration of contrast, left to right from the top. Suspected parathyroid adenoma posterior from the left thyroid lobe in close relation to the common carotid artery (arrows). Note the lower enhancement on NECT (red arrow), higher enhancement compared with the thyroid in the arterial phase (white arrow) and the wash-out of contrast in the early venous phase (yellow arrow)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Enhancement (Y-axis) over time (X-axis) curve. The curve for the suspected parathyroid (yellow) is steeper than the curve for the thyroid (green), and the peaks for the artery (red) and vein (blue) are higher in comparison. An artifact due to motion is observed at 34 s with suboptimal HU measurement of the small parathyroid lesion. The graph also demonstrates venous wash-out of the suspected parathyroid (50–70 s). Additionally, note the lack of prominent difference in enhancement between the adenoma and the thyroid at 25 s after administration of contrast. The purple curve indicates slow continuous enhancement of a lymph node

Full size image

Eleven out of 15 detected adenomas demonstrated a higher peak enhancement in the arterial phase than that in normal thyroid tissue (arterial wash-in). Four out of 15 adenomas had a slightly lower peak enhancement in the arterial phase than that in normal thyroid tissue. These four adenomas showed a lower enhancement than the thyroid in the later venous phases (venous wash-out). The enhancement pattern of the lymph nodes differed from the parathyroid and thyroid tissue with lower maximum enhancement (mean HUmax 102 HU). These lesions did not demonstrate a significant wash-in or wash-out of contrast.

The mean TTP for parathyroid adenomas was calculated at 30.8 s (interval 26–42 s). The mean TTP for normal thyroid tissue was calculated at 32.3 s (interval 26–45 s). The TTP for parathyroid adenomas was observed significantly earlier (p-value 0.008). The MSI was significantly steeper for the adenomas (29.8% vs 22.2%, p-value 0.012).

The mean dose length product was 890.7 mGy cm with a calculated effective dose of 6.7 mSv. The mean dose length product for the scans with an 8 cm volume was 728.3 mGy.cm with a calculated effective dose of 5.5 mSv. The mean dose length product for the three scans with a 16 cm volume was 1540.2 mGy cm with a calculated effective dose of 11.6 mSv.

Discussion

In all the patients, a single enlarged parathyroid could be detected, coinciding with ultrasound findings and surgical localization. By drawing enhancement over time curves, we easily evaluated the pattern of enhancement of a region of interest over time. In this way, wash-in and wash-out of contrast was readily demonstrated. Motion artifacts (due to swallowing, for example) can affect the measurement in the ROI of small lesions, as we demonstrated in one example (Fig. 3). If this effect would have been present on a single and only arterial phase, this might have resulted in missing the lesion, as the difference in enhancement between the lesion and the normal thyroid did decrease in the affected series. Since we possessed other phases for this case, this problem was at least partially overcome.

We found a statistically significant difference in the TTP and MSI between parathyroid and thyroid tissue, with parathyroid adenomas showing a steeper curve and becoming enhanced on average 1.5 s earlier. Since the interval for the TTP for parathyroid adenomas in our study varied between 26 and 42 s after contrast administration, arterial enhancement was less conspicuous with a single arterial phase 25 s after contrast administration (the most common protocol found in the literature).

Cervical lymph nodes are a known mimicker of parathyroid adenomas. Based on their slow and continuous enhancement, these structures can be readily differentiated from parathyroid adenomas. In the case of cervical lymph node metastasis, we could expect an alteration of this enhancement pattern. In a patient presenting with PHPT symptoms, lymph node metastasis would have to be considered an incidentaloma and thus proven to be rare. Localized spread from a parathyroid carcinoma could be considered an associated possibility; however, this disease is also increasingly rare (reported incidence 0.5 to 5% of primary hyperparathyroidism cases) [71]. Another known mimicker of a parathyroid adenoma is ectopic thyroid tissue. It can be suggested that this ectopic thyroid tissue would behave in a similar way to normal thyroid tissue and thus differ from parathyroid adenomas. As we did not come across a relevant case, this remains speculation.

The effective dose associated with our proposed 4DCT protocol has a mean value of 6.7 mSv and can be as low as 1.4 mSv. The effective dose of 4DCT protocols in the literature is situated between 10.4 mSv and 13.8 mSv. The effective dose of scintigraphy is estimated at 7.8 mSv (99mTc-sestamibi-SPECT) or 18.4 mSv (hybrid sestamibi-SPECT) [43, 62]. The last three patients were scanned with a 16 cm volume. The calculated effective dose for these three cases was calculated at 11.5 mSv, still within the dose limits for traditional helical 4DCT, as referenced in the literature [62]. We then managed to define the parameters for a dynamic 4DCT examination within an acceptable exposure range. Since our proposed technique relies more on contrast enhancement of suspected lesions than anatomical detail, further dose reduction can be achieved by lowering the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

This study has several limitations. First there is the small sample size of the study. It is, however, difficult to include patients when an existing and approved standard of care technique such as ultrasound produces excellent results. Our study is also prone to selection bias since we only included patients with positive ultrasound findings who were eligible for surgery. Lesions in patients when surgery is not considered may be smaller and thus more difficult to detect. Comparing the suspected parathyroid lesion to thyroid tissue may also prove problematic in cases of thyroid disease such as thyroiditis with associated diffuse inflammation of the thyroid gland and in cases of (suspicious) thyroid nodules. This may especially prove true in cases of intrathyroidal parathyroid adenomas. Last, we admit that our initial scanning protocol may not have been ideal for the detection of ectopic glands, as an 8 cm volume is small. A 16 cm volume is still within the possibilities of axial scanning and can then include the upper mediastinal structures; however, the dose will be higher, as stated above. Careful selection of parameters (lowering kV and SNR) can help to overcome this issue.

Conclusion

Our 4DCT protocol may allow better visualization of the pattern of enhancement of parathyroid lesions, as enhancement over time curves can be drawn. In this way, wash-in and wash-out of contrast in suspected lesions can be readily demonstrated. Since the interval for the TTP of parathyroid adenomas in our study varied between 26 and 42 s after contrast administration, arterial enhancement of the lesion could prove less conspicuous when scanning 25 s after contrast administration, the most common practice in the literature. Motion artifacts are less problematic as multiple phases are available. TTP was found to be significantly earlier for parathyroid adenomas than for normal thyroid tissue, and the MSI was significantly steeper. Normal lymph nodes can be readily differentiated from parathyroid adenomas due to their slow and continuous enhancement. Exposure to our proposed 4DCT technique is comparable to that for classic helical 4DCT. Careful selection of parameters (lowering kV and SNR) can help to further reduce the dose.

Availability of data and materials

The data analyzed during the current study are included within the article. The different sets of CT images are not publicly available due to medical confidentiality.

Abbreviations

4DCT:

4-Dimensional computed tomography

DLP:

Dose length product

HU:

Hounsfield units

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MSI:

Mean slope of increase

NECT:

Non enhanced computed tomography

PHPT:

Primary hyperparathyroidism

ROI:

Region of interest

SNR:

Signal to noise ratio

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computed tomography

TTP:

Time to peak

References

  1. Lassen T, Friis-Hansen L, Rasmussen AK, Knigge U, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Primary hyperparathyroidism in young people. When should we perform genetic testing for multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN-1)? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11):3983–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan AA, Hanley DA, Rizzoli R, Bollerslev J, Young JE, Rejnmark L, et al. Primary hyperparathyroidism: review and recommendations on evaluation, diagnosis, and management. A Canadian and international consensus. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(1):1–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Plas WY, Noltes ME, van Ginhoven TM, Kruijff S. Secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism: a narrative review. Scand J Surg. 2020;109(4):271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walker MD, Silverberg SJ. Primary hyperparathyroidism. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):115–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bilezikian JP, Brandi ML, Eastell R, Silverberg SJ, Udelsman R, Marcocci C, et al. Guidelines for the management of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: summary statement from the Fourth International Workshop. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(10):3561–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Silverberg SJ, Clarke BL, Peacock M, Bandeira F, Boutroy S, Cusano NE, et al. Current issues in the presentation of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(10):3580–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Udelsman R, Åkerström G, Biagini C, Duh QY, Miccoli P, Niederle B, et al. The surgical management of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(10):3595–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morita SY, Somervell H, Umbricht CB, Dackiw AP, Zeiger MA. Evaluation for concomitant thyroid nodules and primary hyperparathyroidism in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy or thyroidectomy. Surgery. 2008;144(6):862–6; discussion 6–8.

  9. Vitetta GM, Neri P, Chiecchio A, Carriero A, Cirillo S, Mussetto AB, et al. Role of ultrasonography in the management of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: retrospective comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy. J Ultrasound. 2014;17(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Devcic Z, Jeffrey RB, Kamaya A, Desser TS. The elusive parathyroid adenoma: techniques for detection. Ultrasound Q. 2013;29(3):179–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berber E, Parikh RT, Ballem N, Garner CN, Milas M, Siperstein AE. Factors contributing to negative parathyroid localization: an analysis of 1000 patients. Surgery. 2008;144(1):74–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guerin C, Lowery A, Gabriel S, Castinetti F, Philippon M, Vaillant-Lombard J, et al. Preoperative imaging for focused parathyroidectomy: making a good strategy even better. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172(5):519–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hindié E, Zanotti-Fregonara P, Tabarin A, Rubello D, Morelec I, Wagner T, et al. The role of radionuclide imaging in the surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(5):737–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lopez Hänninen E, Vogl TJ, Steinmüller T, Ricke J, Neuhaus P, Felix R. Preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI of the parathyroid glands in hyperparathyroidism. Invest Radiol. 2000;35(7):426–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grayev AM, Gentry LR, Hartman MJ, Chen H, Perlman SB, Reeder SB. Presurgical localization of parathyroid adenomas with magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T: an adjunct method to supplement traditional imaging. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(3):981–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sacconi B, Argirò R, Diacinti D, Iannarelli A, Bezzi M, Cipriani C, et al. MR appearance of parathyroid adenomas at 3 T in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: what radiologists need to know for pre-operative localization. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(3):664–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Starker LF, Mahajan A, Björklund P, Sze G, Udelsman R, Carling T. 4D parathyroid CT as the initial localization study for patients with de novo primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(6):1723–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoang JK, Sung WK, Bahl M, Phillips CD. How to perform parathyroid 4D CT: tips and traps for technique and interpretation. Radiology. 2014;270(1):15–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ichikawa T, Kumazaki T. 4D-CT: a new development in three-dimensional hepatic computed tomography. J Nippon Med Sch. 2000;67(1):24–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodgers SE, Hunter GJ, Hamberg LM, Schellingerhout D, Doherty DB, Ayers GD, et al. Improved preoperative planning for directed parathyroidectomy with 4-dimensional computed tomography. Surgery. 2006;140(6):932–40; discussion 40–1.

  21. Vijayasarathi A, Karnezis S, Azizyan A, Salamon N, Sepahdari A. 4D CT Parathyroid for the general radiologist: a pictorial essay of illustrative cases. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2020.

  22. Wojtczak B, Syrycka J, Kaliszewski K, Rudnicki J, Bolanowski M, Barczyński M. Surgical implications of recent modalities for parathyroid imaging. Gland Surg. 2020;9(Suppl 2):S86–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Acar N, Haciyanli M, Coskun M, Erdogan NK, Celik SC, Haciyanli SG, et al. Diagnostic value of four-dimensional computed tomography and four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism when first-line imaging was inadequate. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020;102(4):294–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zafereo M, Yu J, Angelos P, Brumund K, Chuang HH, Goldenberg D, et al. American head and neck society endocrine surgery section update on parathyroid imaging for surgical candidates with primary hyperparathyroidism. Head Neck. 2019;41(7):2398–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kedarisetty S, Fundakowski C, Ramakrishnan K, Dadparvar S. Clinical Value of Tc99m-MIBI SPECT/CT Versus 4D-CT or US in Management of Patients With Hyperparathyroidism. Ear Nose Throat J. 2019;98(3):149–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yeh R, Tay YD, Tabacco G, Dercle L, Kuo JH, Bandeira L, et al. Diagnostic performance of 4D CT and Sestamibi SPECT/CT in localizing parathyroid adenomas in primary hyperparathyroidism. Radiology. 2019;291(2):469–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Amadou C, Bera G, Ezziane M, Chami L, Delbot T, Rouxel A, et al. 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT and parathyroid 4D computed tomography for primary hyperparathyroidism: the challenge of reoperative patients. World J Surg. 2019;43(5):1232–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vu TH, Schellingerhout D, Guha-Thakurta N, Sun J, Wei W, Kappadth SC, et al. Solitary parathyroid adenoma localization in technetium Tc99m sestamibi SPECT and multiphase multidetector 4D CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(1):142–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Binks M, Burrows D, Littlejohn D. A rural perspective on minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: optimal preoperative imaging and patient outcomes. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(1–2):43–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cunha-Bezerra P, Vieira R, Amaral F, Cartaxo H, Lima T, Montarroyos U, et al. Better performance of four-dimension computed tomography as a localization procedure in normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018.

  31. Tian Y, Tanny ST, Einsiedel P, Lichtenstein M, Stella DL, Phal PM, et al. Four-dimensional computed tomography: clinical impact for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(1):117–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Christakis I, Vu T, Chuang HH, Fellman B, Figueroa AMS, Williams MD, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of neck ultrasound, 4D-computed tomographyand sestamibi imaging in parathyroid carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2017;95:82–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Morón F, Delumpa A, Chetta J, Guffey D, Dunaway D. Single phase computed tomography is equivalent to dual phase method for localizing hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: a retrospective review. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3586.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Goroshi M, Lila AR, Jadhav SS, Sonawane S, Hira P, Goroshi S, et al. Percentage arterial enhancement: an objective index for accurate identification of parathyroid adenoma/hyperplasia in primary hyperparathyroidism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017;87(6):791–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Taywade SK, Damle NA, Behera A, Devasenathipathy K, Bal C, Tripathi M, et al. Comparison of 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography in the preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas-initial results. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017;21(3):399–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zeina AR, Nakar H, Reindorp DN, Nachtigal A, Krausz MM, Itamar I, et al. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) for preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas. Isr Med Assoc J. 2017;19(4):216–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sho S, Yilma M, Yeh MW, Livhits M, Wu JX, Hoang JK, et al. Prospective validation of two 4D-CT-based scoring systems for prediction of multigland disease in primary hyperparathyroidism. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(12):2323–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Fitzgerald RT, Kuruva M, David R, Samant RS, Kumar M, Van Hemert R, et al. Characterization of thyroid nodules by 4-dimensional computed tomography: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017;41(2):195–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rameau A, Eng S, Vu J, Saket R, Jun P, Friduss M. Four-dimensional computed tomography scan utility in parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism with low baseline intact parathyroid hormone. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(6):1476–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ramirez AG, Shada AL, Martin AN, Raghavan P, Durst CR, Mukherjee S, et al. Clinical efficacy of 2-phase versus 4-phase computed tomography for localization in primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 2016;160(3):731–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Forghani R, Roskies M, Liu X, Tan X, Mlynarek A, Payne RJ, et al. Dual-energy CT characteristics of parathyroid adenomas on 25-and 55-second 4D-CT acquisitions: preliminary experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016;40(5):806–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee EK, Yun TJ, Kim JH, Lee KE, Kim SJ, Won JK, et al. Effect of tumor volume on the enhancement pattern of parathyroid adenoma on parathyroid four-dimensional CT. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(5):495–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hinson AM, Lee DR, Hobbs BA, Fitzgerald RT, Bodenner DL, Stack BC. Preoperative 4D CT localization of nonlocalizing parathyroid adenomas by ultrasound and SPECT-CT. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153(5):775–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bahl M, Sepahdari AR, Sosa JA, Hoang JK. Parathyroid adenomas and hyperplasia on four-dimensional CT scans: three patterns of enhancement relative to the thyroid gland justify a three-phase protocol. Radiology. 2015;277(2):454–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boury S. New methods for parathyroid imaging: sonography, 4D CT. MRI Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2015;76(2):148–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hoang JK, Reiman RE, Nguyen GB, Januzis N, Chin BB, Lowry C, et al. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer from radiation exposure during parathyroid imaging: comparison of 4D CT and parathyroid scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(5):W579–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lundstroem AK, Trolle W, Soerensen CH, Myschetzky PS. Preoperative localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands with 4D-CT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(5):1253–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Seeliger B, Alesina PF, Koch JA, Hinrichs J, Meier B, Walz MK. Diagnostic value and clinical impact of complementary CT scan prior to surgery for non-localized primary hyperparathyroidism. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400(3):307–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cham S, Sepahdari AR, Hall KE, Yeh MW, Harari A. Dynamic parathyroid computed tomography (4DCT) facilitates reoperative parathyroidectomy and enables cure of missed hyperplasia. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(11):3537–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Day KM, Elsayed M, Beland MD, Monchik JM. The utility of 4-dimensional computed tomography for preoperative localization of primary hyperparathyroidism in patients not localized by sestamibi or ultrasonography. Surgery. 2015;157(3):534–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Campbell MJ, Sicuro P, Alseidi A, Blackmore CC, Ryan JA. Two-phase (low-dose) computed tomography is as effective as 4D-CT for identifying enlarged parathyroid glands. Int J Surg. 2015;14:80–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sepahdari AR, Bahl M, Harari A, Kim HJ, Yeh MW, Hoang JK. Predictors of multigland disease in primary hyperparathyroidism: a scoring system with 4D-CT imaging and biochemical markers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(5):987–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Suh YJ, Choi JY, Kim SJ, Chun IK, Yun TJ, Lee KE, et al. Comparison of 4D CT, ultrasonography, and 99mTc sestamibi SPECT/CT in localizing single-gland primary hyperparathyroidism. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(3):438–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ginsburg M, Christoforidis GA, Zivin SP, Obara P, Wroblewski K, Angelos P, et al. Adenoma localization for recurrent or persistent primary hyperparathyroidism using dynamic four-dimensional CT and venous sampling. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(1):79–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Raghavan P, Durst CR, Ornan DA, Mukherjee S, Wintermark M, Patrie JT, et al. Dynamic CT for parathyroid disease: are multiple phases necessary? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(10):1959–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Brown SJ, Lee JC, Christie J, Maher R, Sidhu SB, Sywak MS, et al. Four-dimensional computed tomography for parathyroid localization: a new imaging modality. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(6):483–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hunter GJ, Ginat DT, Kelly HR, Halpern EF, Hamberg LM. Discriminating parathyroid adenoma from local mimics by using inherent tissue attenuation and vascular information obtained with four-dimensional CT: formulation of a multinomial logistic regression model. Radiology. 2014;270(1):168–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bahl M, Muzaffar M, Vij G, Sosa JA, Choudhury KR, Hoang JK. Prevalence of the polar vessel sign in parathyroid adenomas on the arterial phase of 4D CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(3):578–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Kelly HR, Hamberg LM, Hunter GJ. 4D-CT for preoperative localization of abnormal parathyroid glands in patients with hyperparathyroidism: accuracy and ability to stratify patients by unilateral versus bilateral disease in surgery-naive and re-exploration patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(1):176–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Sepahdari AR, Yeh MW, Rodrigues D, Khan SN, Harari A. Three-phase parathyroid 4-dimensional computed tomography initial experience: inexperienced readers have high accuracy and high interobserver agreement. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013;37(4):511–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hunter GJ, Schellingerhout D, Vu TH, Perrier ND, Hamberg LM. Accuracy of four-dimensional CT for the localization of abnormal parathyroid glands in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Radiology. 2012;264(3):789–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mahajan A, Starker LF, Ghita M, Udelsman R, Brink JA, Carling T. Parathyroid four-dimensional computed tomography: evaluation of radiation dose exposure during preoperative localization of parathyroid tumors in primary hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg. 2012;36(6):1335–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gafton AR, Glastonbury CM, Eastwood JD, Hoang JK. Parathyroid lesions: characterization with dual-phase arterial and venous enhanced CT of the neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(5):949–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Kutler DI, Moquete R, Kazam E, Kuhel WI. Parathyroid localization with modified 4D-computed tomography and ultrasonography for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(6):1219–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Eichhorn-Wharry LI, Carlin AM, Talpos GB. Mild hypercalcemia: an indication to select 4-dimensional computed tomography scan for preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas. Am J Surg. 2011;201(3):334–8; discussion 8.

  66. Beland MD, Mayo-Smith WW, Grand DJ, Machan JT, Monchik JM. Dynamic MDCT for localization of occult parathyroid adenomas in 26 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(1):61–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lubitz CC, Hunter GJ, Hamberg LM, Parangi S, Ruan D, Gawande A, et al. Accuracy of 4-dimensional computed tomography in poorly localized patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 2010;148(6):1129–37; discussion 37–8.

  68. Mortenson MM, Evans DB, Lee JE, Hunter GJ, Shellingerhout D, Vu T, et al. Parathyroid exploration in the reoperative neck: improved preoperative localization with 4D-computed tomography. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(5):888–95; discussion 95–6.

  69. Lambert JW, Phillips ED, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Nardo L, Facchetti L, Gould RG. Axial or Helical? Considerations for wide collimation CT scanners capable of volumetric imaging in both modes. Med Phys. 2017;44(11):5718–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4):1–332.

  71. Givi B, Shah JP. Parathyroid carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010;22(6):498–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Jette, Belgium

    Steven Raeymaeckers, Yannick De Brucker, Tim Vanderhasselt, Nico Buls & Johan De Mey

  2. Medical Physics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Jette, Belgium

    Nico Buls

  3. Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Jette, Belgium

    Johan De Mey

Authors
  1. Steven Raeymaeckers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yannick De Brucker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tim Vanderhasselt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nico Buls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Johan De Mey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

(1) Guarantor of integrity of the entire study: SR. (2) Study concepts and design: SR/YDB. (3) Literature research: SR. (4) Clinical studies: SR. (5) Experimental studies/data analysis: N/A. (6) Statistical analysis: NB. (7) Manuscript preparation: SR. (8) Manuscript editing: TVDH/JDM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Raeymaeckers.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the University Hospital of Brussels (UZB/VUB) on 29/06/2016 with trial registration number B.U.N. 143201627917. Written informed consent for patient participation was obtained.

Consent for publication

The patients consented for anonymized data to be published.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raeymaeckers, S., De Brucker, Y., Vanderhasselt, T. et al. Detection of parathyroid adenomas with multiphase 4DCT: towards a true four-dimensional technique. BMC Med Imaging 21, 64 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00597-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00597-1

Keywords

BMC Medical Imaging

ISSN: 1471-2342

Contact us