Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich (HWW) syndrome is a very rare congenital anomaly of the urogenital tract involving Müllerian ducts and Wolffian structures, and it is characterized by the triad of didelphys uterus, obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis. It generally occurs at puberty and exhibits non-specific and variable symptoms with acute or pelvic pain shortly following menarche, causing a delay in the diagnosis. Moreover, the diagnosis is complicated by the infrequency of this syndrome, because Müllerian duct anomalies (MDA) are infrequently encountered in a routine clinical setting.
Cases presentation
two cases of HWW syndrome in adolescents and a differential diagnosis for one case of a different MDA, and the impact of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technology to achieve the correct diagnosis.
Conclusions
MR imaging is a very suitable diagnostic tool in order to perform the correct diagnosis of HWW syndrome.
Background
The association of renal agenesis with ipsilateral blind hemivagina and didelphys uterus is reported as Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich (HWW) syndrome; this triad was initially disclosed in an English report published in 2006 [1].
The incidence of didelphys uterus, related to HWW, is approximately 1/2,000 to 1/28,000, and it is accompanied by unilateral renal agenesis in 43% of cases. The incidence of unilateral renal agenesis is 1/1,100, and 25-50% of affected women exhibits associated genital abnormalities [2].
HWW syndrome represents a type of Müllerian duct anomalies (MDA) associated with mesonephric duct anomalies. MDA are congenital entities resulting from non-development (agenesia or hypoplasia), defective vertical or lateral fusion, or resorption failure of the Müllerian (paramesonephric) ducts [3].
MDA are estimated to have an overall prevalence of 2% to 3% among all women, with an incidence of 1/200-600 among fertile women. Hypoplasia, as well as agenesis of the uterus and proximal vagina, accounts for 5%-10% of Müllerian duct anomalies, whereas didelphys uterus accounts for approximately 11% of Müllerian duct anomalies. Renal tract anomalies are associated with MDA in as many as 30% of cases [4].
A complete or partial vaginal septum is present in 75% of women with didelphys uterus [5].
The exact cause, pathogenesis and embryologic origin of HWW syndrome are unclear and remain a subject of discussion [6].
HWW syndrome is usually discovered at puberty with non-specific symptoms, like increasing pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea and palpable mass due to the associated haematocolpos or hematometra, which result from retained, longstanding menstrual flow in the obstrucucted vagina.
It rarely occurs with primary infertility in early adulthood when the vaginal septum is incomplete [7].
It is really difficult to achieve to an accurate diagnosis because menstruation is often regular and when patient complains symptoms of cyclic dysmenorrhea, they are usually given anti-inflammatory drugs and oral-contraceptives, thus causing a delay in the diagnosis because they reduce or eliminate menses; ultimately, HWW is an uncommon syndrome, not often thought of as a diagnostic possibility [8].
The potential complications of this syndrome are distinct in acute complications, such as pyohematocolpos, pyosalpinx, or pelviperitonitis, and long-term complications, such as endometriosis, pelvic adhesions and increased risk of abortion or infertility [9, 10].
The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) established a classification of Müllerian duct anomalies in 1988 in order to group them in entirety (Table 1) [11].
Table 1
Classification of müllerian duct anomalies
MULLERIAN AGENESIS OR HYPOLPLASIA
a) vagina
b) cervix
c) fundus
d) fallopian tube
e) combined agenesis or hypoplasia (two or more findings from classes I-A through I-D)
UNICORNUATE UTERUS (Agenesis or hypoplasia of one of the two Mullerian ducts)
• rudimentary horn with an endometrial cavity that communicates with the (single-horned) uterus;
• rudimentary horn with an endometrial cavity that does not communicate with the uterus;
• rudimentary horn with no endometrial cavity;
no rudimentary horn
UTERUS DYDELPHYS
(Failure of lateral fusion between vagina and two Mullerian ducts)
BICORNUATE UTERUS
(Incomplete fusion of uterine horns at the level of the fundus)
a) complete (septum extends to the internal or external os);
b) partial (septum is confined to the fundal region)
SEPTATE UTERUS
(Incomplete or absent resorption of uterovaginal septum)
a) complete (septum extends to the internal os);
b) partial (septum does not reach the internal os)
ARCHUATE UTERUS
(Light indent of the fundus of the uterus due to almost complete resorption of the uterovaginal septum)
UTERUS EXPOSED TO DIETHYILSTILBESTROL-RELATED UTERINE ANOMALIES
a) T-shaped uterus;
b) T-shaped uterus with dilated horns;
c) Uterine hypoplasia
According to this classification, HWW syndrome appears to include the addition of III uterine anomaly to Ia vaginal anomaly and renal agenesis (Table 2).
Table 2
Hww syndrome: mr findings
HWW SYNDROME
MR FINDINGS
Uterus didelphys
It is characterized by two symmetric, widely divergent uterine horns and two cervixes, with an enlarged cavity filled by bloody/proteinaceous fluid due to haematocolpos.
It appears hyperintense signal on T1 fat saturated sequences.
Hemivagina
It is an obstructed vagina due to a longitudinal septum which occludes one cervix and isolates it with consequent hematometra.
Renal aplasya
It is tipically omolateral to the vaginal anomaly (right side prevalence), with possible controlateral renal hypertrophy due to compensation but in site.
Ovaries
Possible presence of endometriosic cysts with hyperintense signal on T1 fat sat sequences and with "shading sign" on T2-weighted images and a gradual variation of signal intensity due to chronic bleeding with accumulation of high concentration of iron and protein in the endometrioma
(endometriotic lesions appear hyperintense on T1-weighted images and mildly hypointense or hyperintense on T2-weighted images).
Possible presence of functional cysts with no clinical significance, which appear hyperintense on T2 sequences and hypo/isointense on T1 sequences.
Case presentation
Patient 1
A 16-years-old female presented with a history of severe abdomino-pelvic pain, which increased lasting 2 to 7 days with each of her menstrual cycles, hindering her daily activities.
Gynecologic history indicated menarche at 13 years of age, followed by 3 years of irregular menses.
The patient denied any recent abdominal trauma, abnormal vaginal bleeding, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea.
A bimanual physical examination indicated a right-sided cystic and tender pelvic mass, movable, mildly tender to palpation. The medical staff recommended further evaluation such as US, which showed the absence of right kidney and the possibility of uterine anomaly; so Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed in order to evaluate the possible genito-urinary anomaly.
The MRI examination was performed on a 1.5 Tesla MR clinical scanner (Siemens, Avanto Erlangen Germany). The patient's mother gave her informed consent for MRI exam. Images were acquired on multiple planes with T1-weighted (TR 714 ms; TE 12 ms) and T2-weighted Turbo Spin Echo (TR 5530 ms; TE 150 ms) sequences; fat-suppressed T2-weighted TSE images (TR 6810 ms; TE 150 ms), Flash3D T1-weighted (TR 5.2; TE 2.5) and HASTE sequences (TR 700; TE 89). A contrast agent was not used as it was not considered necessary.
MRI imaging showed a uterine-vaginal anomaly consisting of didelphys uterus and double vagina, one of which was obstructed (Figure 1); consequently, there was accumulation of fluid exhibiting a signal intensity similar to methaemoglobin in the right uterus (slightly dilated, 14 mm diameter of the lumen) and in the right obstructed vagina (which appeared to be considerably dilated, 43 × 34 × 35 mm).
Figure 1
Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome (C) Drawing illustrates the triad (renal agenesis, didelphys uterus, and obstructed hemivagina and in this case the presence of an endometriosic cyst. A 16-years-old girl presenting the triad of didelphys uterus (class III MDA), an obstructed right hemivagina (class I MDA), and ipsilateral renal agenesis. (A) Axial turbo spin-echo T2 weighted (B) Axial turbo spin-echo T1 fat-saturated weighted MR image showing centrally a hematocolpos (asterisk), a finding corresponding to the obstructed right hemivagina. Mild dilation of the right endometrial cavity (curved arrow) with fluid exhibiting a signal intensity similar to methaemoglobin due to haematometra.
In the right ovary an expanding mass of 31 mm was hyperintense on T1-weighted images and mildly hypointense or hyperintense on T2-weighted images (Figure 2A). The mass was characterized by a typical "shading" sign (Figure 2B) and exhibited features compatible with an endometriosic cyst; there was mild fluid in the pouch of Douglas.
Figure 2
A) Sagittal T2 TSE weighted image showing a mild fluid in the pouch of Douglas. (B) Sagittal T1 TSE fat-suppressed weighted image showing distention of the right endometrial cavity (long straight arrow) with high-signal-intensity material distending the right endometrial cavity and cervix (asterisk), a finding indicative of right hematometrocolpos; on the right ovary presence of an endometriosic cysts appearing hyperintense on T1 fat-saturated image (short straight arrow).
There was no evidence of an expansive process in the left ovary. The extension of examination to the upper abdomen revealed right renal agenesis and apparent compensatory hypertrophy of the left kidney (Figure 3).
Figure 3
A) Oblique coronal TSE T2-weighted MR image shows a complete view of the anatomical defects. B) Coronal T2 Trufi MR image showing the omolateral renal aplasia with respect to the pelvic abnormalities and a solitary left kidney with a mild hypertrophy.
Patient 2
A 15-years-old woman presented with severe abdominal pain that occurred since the patient achieved menarche at 14 years of age; the patient also had irregular menstruation with severe dysmenorrhea and she reported that the pain worsened immediately prior to menstruation and improved with menstrual flow.
Upon physical examination, the findings were non-specific, with the exception of lower abdominal tenderness, arising from the pelvis, mildly tender to palpation. A gynecologic examination did not reveal any anomalies of her external genitalia or hymen.
So, MRI was then performed, using the same sequences protocol employed for Patient 1.
Contrast agent was not given and the patient's mother provided informed consent to perform MRI exam.
MRI indicated a uterine-vaginal malformation consisting of didelphys uterus communicating with a double vagina, of which the right vagina was obstructed (Figure 4). Consequently, there was a collection of fluid that exhibited a high signal intensity on T1 fat-saturated sequences, referred to as methaemoglobin, both in the right uterus (slightly enlarged: 18 mm diameter), and in the right obstructed vagina (which appears to be highly dilated and thus compressing the bladder, 60 × 65 × 76 mm) referred to hematocolpos (Figure 5).
Figure 4
Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome (C) Drawing illustrates the triad. A 15-years-old girl presenting the triad of didelphys uterus (class III MDA), an obstructed right hemivagina (class I MDA), and ipsilateral renal agenesis. (A) Axial turbo spin-echo T2 weighted MR image (B) Axial turbo spin-echo T1 fat-saturated weighted MR image showing centrally a wide hematocolpos (asterisk), corresponding to the obstructed right hemivagina. On the left side the uterus normally communicating with non-obstructed hemivagina.
Figure 5
A) Sagittal T2-weighted MR image demonstrates an enormously dilated hemivagina (asterisk) due to the presence of the transverse septum causing the obstruction and low T2-signal-intensity contents corresponding to a high T1-signal intensity; B) consistent with blood product due to the presence of haemoglobin.
There was no evidence of an expansive process in the ovaries, but the extension of the examination to the upper abdomen showed right renal agenesis and apparent compensatory hypertrophy of the left kidney (Figure 6).
Figure 6
A) Coronal T2 weighted images show the wide hematocolpos (asterisk). B) Trufi coronal image demonstrates the absence of right kidney, omolateral to the pelvic alteration, and a mild compensatory hypertrophy of the left kidney.
Patient 3: an example of differential diagnosis
A 13-years-old female presented with severe abdominal pain. She reported that the pain had begun a few months earlier and had subsequently worsened over the past several weeks. The pain worsened immediately prior to menstruation and then improved once menstrual flow began. The patient also reported worsening constipation and denied problems with urination, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea.
The patient underwent menarche 2 months prior with menses exhibiting 3 to 4 days of very light flow. Physical examination did not reveal any alteration of her external genitalia. A previous sonography revealed a solitary left kidney as well as probable unicornuate uterus.
MRI examination confirmed an unicornuate uterus with a left single horn open into a normal vagina and a controlateral non-communicating rudimentary horn that contained material with a signal intensity similar to methaemoglobin (Figure 7).
Figure 7
A) TSE axial T2 weighted MR image. B) Axial fat-saturated T1-weighted images. C) Drawing illustrates a 14-year-old girl with an unicornuate uterus and rudimentary right horn with an endometrial cavity that does not communicate with the uterus (class II MDA type) and shows an obstructed functional right uterine horn (long straight arrow) containing blood degradation products and a corresponding high T1fs-signal intensity, exhibiting no communication with the cavity of the normal left uterine horn (short straight arrow).
The ipsilateral Fallopian tube was characterized by fluid sero-mucinous distension (Figure 8). In the right paramedian side, at the level of the Douglas, posterior to the ideal point of continuity between uterus and rudimentary horn, there were some adjacent nodules most likely of endometrial etiology (14 mm, 38 mm in total) (Figure 9). In addition, a moderate rate of pelvic fluid was present.
Figure 8
A) Sagittal T2-weighted MR image shows a normal left uterine cavity communicating with a normal cervix (long straight arrow), which in turn communicates with a normal vagina. (B) Right hematosalpinx (asterisk) with a distended non-communicating horn filled with fluid moderately hyperintense on T2 sequences due to haemoglobin degradation products.
Figure 9
A-B-C) Coronal T2 weighted images demonstrate the absence of right kidney, omolateral to the pelvic alteration.
The extension of the examination to the upper abdomen showed agenesis of the right kidney with compensatory hypertrophy of the left one and a left renal artery with a larger lumen, most likely of functional significance.
This is, evidently, another kind of MDA, different from the HWW syndrome, showing an association with uterine anomaly type IIb with renal aplasia, whereas HWW syndrome displays an association with Ia vaginal anomaly with a III uterine anomaly and renal aplasia.
Conclusions
It could be desirable to achieve to an early diagnosis and treatment of HWW syndrome, in order to relieve acute symptoms, preserve normal fertility and prevent several medical complications. The correct diagnosis can be difficult due to the absence of specific findings upon physical examination and to non specific symptoms which delay the diagnosis.
Ultrasonography (US) is a very helpful tool in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies, infact the detection of haematocolpos, which appears as a fluid collection with low-level echoes, can make the diagnosis of genitor-urinary tract anomaly (didelphic uterus) easier, although it cannot identify the type of Müllerian ducts anomaly (MDA), whereas MRI, in cases when the differentiation of the uterine anomaly is not easily achievable by means of previous examination (physical examination, US, hysterosalpingography), is a suitable technique for the non-invasive evaluation of female pelvic anatomy because it provides more detailed information regarding uterine morphology, the continuity with each vaginal (obstructed and non-obstructed) lumen, and fluid content nature [12].
When a high suspicion of MDA exists, US should be performed initially to delineate any abnormalities in the genital tract, however, in order to obtain an accurate MDA classification, magnetic resonance imaging must be performed.
Although US, CT scan, and hysterosalpingography are commonly used for diagnosis because of their low cost, MRI is the most accurate method for diagnosis and it could help patients in maintaining fertility by allowing the most appropriate treatment option to be used [13].
In fact, in comparison to the other modalities, MRI is more sensitive in detecting the uterine contour, the shape of the intrauterine cavity, the character of the septum, as well as associated aspects such as endometriosis, pelvic inflammation and adhesions.
However, laparoscopy should now be considered the gold standard for the evaluation of female reproductive tract anomaly, although it could be reserved when the diagnosis is not clear after imaging or when MRI is not available and not performed as a routine procedure [7].
The decision to perform a laparoscopy is based on the following:
the interval between menarche and diagnosis;
the severity of the symptoms;
the presence of a hematometra or pyometra.
Laparoscopy can be also therapeutic in some selected cases such as: drainage of hematocolpos/hematometrocolpos, septectomy, or marsupialization of the blind hemivagina. It is considered very helpful in order to reduce pelvic pain and lower the risk of infection and of further hematometra [1].
The outcome of pregnancy in these patients reveals that 87% go on to have a successful pregnancy, while abortions occur in 23% of the patients, 15% have preterm births, and 62% have full-term pregnancies and uncomplicated deliveries.
If surgery is not an immediate option for patients with HWW syndrome, menstrual suppression with combined oral contraceptive pills is advised to prevent further accumulation of hematocolpos and further hematometra [14, 15].
The consequences that potentially occur due to the failure of treatment include urinary retention, hematosalpinx (blood in the fallopian tube), endometriosis and rupture of a tubo-ovarian abscess [16].
With each diagnosis of didelphys uterus in association with obstructed hemivagina on the lower abdomen MRI, HWW syndrome should be excluded and the exam should be extended to the upper abdomen to check for the presence of ipsilateral kidney.
Renal tract anomalies are associated with MDA in up to 30% of cases due to the close embryologic relationship between the paramesonephric and mesonephric ducts.
The most common renal tract anomaly associated with MDA is renal agenesis with right side prevalence [1, 17, 18]. Therefore, in all patients who present an MDA, it is imperative to investigate the urinary tract.
If renal agenesia is diagnosed, patients should have continuous follow-up to check for renal functioning as the risk of renal failure is very high [19]. Another very common condition in HWW syndrome patients is associated endometriosis.
The underlying pathophysiological mechanism is potentially the increased risk of retrograde menstruation: because of the obstructed vaginal outflow, the risk of endometrial tissue reflux through the fallopian tube, which can result in retrograde endometriosis, is higher, confirming the theory postulated by Sampson [20].
Several reports have confirmed that an association with endometriosis is present in obstructive Müllerian anomalies such as HWW syndrome, but it has not been confirmed to date in non-obstructive malformations. Therefore, it is imperative that MRI technology should be used to evaluate the presence of endometriosis.
Additionally, the presence of associated hematocolpos and hematometra, as well as the presence of an irregularly shaped or sized adnexal structure, or potentially expanding masses inside, need to be detected.
Another kind of obstructive Müllerian anomalies, different from the HWW syndrome, is OHVIRA syndrome, characterized by a variety of associated disorders. Infact, while the classic presentation includes obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly (OHVIRA), some authors reported other renal anomalies, such as duplicated kidneys, dysplastic kidneys or retrovescical bands [21]. There have been also few reports of varied uterine anatomy; infact, a series of 42 cases of OHVIRA syndrome described, in 22% of cases, a septate uteri [15], but the majorority of cases are duplicated or didelphys uterus, although it has been described a case with two cervices, two uterine cavities and a single uterus [22].
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Abbreviations
HWW syndrome:
Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome
MDA:
Müllerian Duct Anomalies
US:
ultrasonography: MR: Magnetic Resonance
MRI:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
ASRM:
American Society for Reproductive Medicine
CT:
Computed Tomography.
Declarations
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Department of Radiology, Campus Bio-Medico Univeristy of Rome
References
Gholoum S, Puligandla PS, Hui T, Su W, Quiros E, Laberge JM: Management and outcome of patients with combined vaginal septum, bifid uterus and ipsilateral renal agenesis (Herlin-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 2006, 41 (5): 987-92. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.01.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Alan JW, Louis RK: Campbell-Walsh Urology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 3270-6. 9Google Scholar
Lee BH, Kim JW, Oh SI, et al: 3 cases of uterus didelphys with obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 1997, 40: 1489-95.Google Scholar
Heinonen PK: Clinical implications of the didelphic uterus: long-term follow-up of 49 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000, 91: 183-90. 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00259-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Park Noh Hyuck, Park Hee Jin, Park Chan Sup, Park Sung Il: Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich Syndrome with Unilateral Hemivaginal Obstruction, Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis and Contralateral Renal Thin GBM Disease: A Case Report with Radiological Follow Up. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2010, 62: 383-388.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Zurawin RK, Dietrich JE, Heard MJ, Edwards CL: Didelphic uterus and obstructed hemivagina with renal agenesis: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004, 17: 137-41. 10.1016/j.jpag.2004.01.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kim TE, et al: Hysteroscopic resection of the vaginal septum in uterus didelphys with obstructed hemivagina: a case report. J Korean Med Sci. 2007, 22: 766-769. 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.4.766.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Grimbizis GF, et al: Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update. 2001, 7: 161-174. 10.1093/humupd/7.2.161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
American Fertility Society: The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies. Müllerian duct anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988, 49: 944-55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tanaka YO, Kurosaki Y, Kobayashi T, et al: Uterus didelphys associated with obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis: MR findings in seven cases. Abdom Imaging. 1998, 23 (4): 437-441. 10.1007/s002619900375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Foglia RP, Kim SH, Cleveland RH, Donahoe PK: Complications of vaginal atresia in association with a duplicated Müllerian duct. J Pediatr Surg. 1987, 22 (7): 653-656. 10.1016/S0022-3468(87)80120-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Haddad B, Barranger E, Paniel BJ: Blind hemivagina: long-term follow-up and reproductive performance in 42 cases. Hum Reprod. 1999, 14 (8): 1962-1964. 10.1093/humrep/14.8.1962.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Geley TE, Unsinn KM, Ganer I: Diagnosing neonatal female genital anomalies using saline-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001, 177: 1041-1044.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Burgis J: Obstructive Müllerian anomalies: Case report, diagnosis, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 185: 338-44. 10.1067/mob.2001.116738.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gruenwald P: Relation of the growing Müllerian duct to the Wolffian duct and its importance for the genesis of malformation. Anat Rec. 1941, 81: 1-20. 10.1002/ar.1090810102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Park Noh Hyuck, Park Hee Jin, Park Chan Sup, Park Sung Il: Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich Syndrome with Unilateral Hemivaginal Obstruction, Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis and Contralateral Renal Thin GBM Disease: A Case Report with Radiological Follow Up. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2010, 62: 383-388.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Shavell VI, Montgomery SE, Johnson SC, Diamond MP, Berman JM: Complete septate uterus, obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly: pregnancy course complicated by a rare urogenital anomaly. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009, 280: 449-52. 10.1007/s00404-008-0919-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Shah Divya, Laufer Marc: Obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly (OHVIRA) syndrome with a single uterus. Fertility and Sterility. 2011, 96: e39-e41. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
