Subjects
The LN group consisted of 30 female patients with LN and nephrology admitted to our hospital between January 2016 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria were (1) conformation to the diagnostic criteria of SLE, as revised by American College of Rheumatology in 1997, to obtain a SLEDAI score, and (2) diagnosis via renal biopsy pathology. The control group consisted of 20 healthy female volunteers who underwent examination. Inclusion criteria were (1) no history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and kidney disease; (2) no current kidney disease; (3) had not recently received any drug with obvious nephrotoxicity; and (4) acceptable kidney function according to various laboratory test indices. Before examination, all patients received no medicine for 8 h and fasted for at least 6 h. Water was withheld for 4 h before the examination [4]. All patients performed exercise bouts with end-expiratory breath holding before the MRI test. This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital. All patients who participated in the study signed an informed consent form.
Advanced MRI test
Conventional MRI and DTI, DWI, and BOLD scanning was performed on the kidney using the GE Singa HDxt GE3.0 T MR system. Post-image processing techniques were used to obtain the FA, ADC, and R2* values for the kidney.
Relevant laboratory test indices
All patients with LN received 99mTc-DTPA (99mTc pentanoic acid) renal dynamic imaging in the Department of Nuclear Medicine of the hospital 1 week before and after the MRI test to obtain the SKGFR (the single kidney glomerular filtration rate). Levels of mALB and urinary NGAL were obtained from urine samples. Serum creatinine, C3, C1q, and anti-ds-DNA were obtained from blood samples.
Renal pathological examination
Subjects underwent renal biopsy under the guidance of color ultrasonography 7 days before and after the MRI test. Hematoxylin–eosin staining, periodic acid-schiff stain, Masson staining, and periodic acid-GMS were used for kidney tissues. For immunopathology, a fast, sensitive, direct immunization was utilized. The fluorescence intensity distribution of complement C3 and C1q was expressed with “ ± , + , + + , + + + ” and replaced by “0.5, 1, 2, 3” when processed statistically. Based on ISN/RPS (International Society of Nephrology/Society of renal pathology) (2003) criteria, patients with LN were classified as follows: type II (n = 4), type III (n = 6, including type III merged with type V), type IV (n = 12, including type IV merged with type V), and type V (n = 8). The groups did not differ by GFR (glomerular filtration rate) or age. Using the semi-quantitative scoring method of the NIH (National Institutes of health), the AI (Activity index) and CI (Chronic index) were calculated for the patient group.
Collection of advanced MRI data
MRI scanning method
Singa HDxt 3.0 T magnetic resonance scanner (General Electric, Wisconsin, WI, USA) is used. After routine T1WI and T2WI renal scanning, renal DWI imaging was performed. DWI adopts single shot echo plane imaging (SS-EPI) sequence, TR 6316 ms, TE 63.1 ms, matrix 96*180, FOV 340 mm*240 mm, NEX 8 times, b value is 800 s/mm2. The scanning center layer is located at the center layer of the kidney, with 6 layers. The surface phased array coil is used. The breath gating technology is used to eliminate the artifacts caused by the movement of abdominal organs, and the fat suppression technology is used to suppress the abdominal fat signal. Subjects received conventional double kidney T1W1 and T2W1 scanning using BOLD imaging.
DWI and DTI using a single-shot echo-planar sequence
The scanning center level was in the center of the kidney. Six levels with a layer thickness of 8 mm were used. Using DWI images showing good corticomedullary demarcations, the central zone of renal hilum was selected to draw the regions-of-interest (ROI). ROI was drawn at the clearly demarcated level of renal skin and medulla, and the cortical contour was delineated with lines to avoid renal cysts and chemical shift artifacts as much as possible. Use a circular tool to draw three circular areas of about 15-25mm2 in the upper, middle and lower polar circles of the kidney. Average values were assigned for the ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) and FA (fractional anisotropy) of the corresponding renal medulla.
BOLD imaging used the Functool 9.4.05a software package of ADW4.4 Workstation's Functool Workstation (General Electric, Wisconsin, WI, USA) for post-processing of the scanning data. The R2* post-process platform was selected. The software system automatically generated the R2* image. The R2* value was obtained using the same method as above.
The images were measured and analyzed jointly by two MRI attending physicians, and they were discussed when they had different opinions.
Statistical methods
Data analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 22.0. Measurement data conforming to the normal distribution were presented as “ ± s”. Comparisons between multiple groups were performed using ANOVA. The LSD (Least Significant Difference)—t test was used for pairwise comparisons, if there was the homogeneity of variance, while the Tamhane T2 test was used if there was the heterogeneity of variance. Data correlation was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.