Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Synthetic double inversion recovery imaging in brain MRI: quantitative evaluation and feasibility of synthetic MRI and a comparison with conventional double inversion recovery and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences

Original Submission
26 Apr 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
3 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Takahito Nakajima
9 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Takahito Nakajima
Resubmission - Version 2
3 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Takahito Nakajima
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Takahito Nakajima
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Takahito Nakajima
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
16 Aug 2022 Editorially accepted
27 Oct 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12880-022-00877-4

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page