Skip to main content

Evidence and assessment of parenchymal patterns of ultrasonography for breast cancer detection among Chinese women: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background

Screening of breast cancer in asymptomatic women is important to evaluate for early diagnosis. In China ultrasound is a more frequently used method than mammography for the detection of breast cancer. The objectives of the study were to provide evidence and assessment of parenchymal patterns of ultrasonography for breast cancer detection among Chinese women.

Methods

Breast ultrasound examinations including the parenchymatous pattern of cytopathological confirmed breast cancer (n = 541) and age-matched cytopathological not confirmed breast cancer (n = 849) women were retrospectively reviewed by seven sonographer physicians. According to compositions of ducts, the thickness of the breast, diameter of ducts, fat lobules, and fibro glandular tissues, the breast parenchymatous pattern was categorized into heterogeneous (high percentage of fatty tissues), ductal (the inner diameters of ducts > 50% of the thick mass of the breast), mixed (the inner diameters of ducts was 50% of the thick mass of the breast), and fibrous categories (a dense classification of the breast).

Results

Heterogeneous (p < 0.0001, OR = 3.972) and fibrous categories (p < 0.0001, OR = 2.702) were higher among women who have cytopathological confirmed breast cancer than those who have not cytopathological confirmed breast cancer. The heterogeneous category was high-risk ultrasonographic examination category followed by the fibrous category. Agreements between sonographer physicians for categories of ultrasonic examinations were fair to good (Cohen’s k = 0.591).

Conclusions

Breast cancer risk in Chinese asymptomatic women differ according to the ultrasonographic breast parenchymal pattern.

Level of Evidence: III.

Technical efficacy stage: 2.

Peer Review reports

Background

Breast cancer is the most common in Chinese women [1, 2]. Screening of breast cancer in asymptomatic women is important to evaluate for the early diagnosis [3]. Considering various risks for breast cancer, various breast cancer assessment models are developed to identify the risk of breast cancer [1] but there is a lack of a consistent breast cancer assessment model for Chinese women [4]. A proper screening method of breast cancer for Chinese women is necessary [5].

Genetic and environmental factors affect breast parenchymatous tissue structure and there is a correlation between breast parenchymatous tissue structure and the risk of breast cancer in any individual woman [6]. Therefore, it is possible to predict the breast cancer risk of a healthy woman by imaging modalities like mammography and ultrasound.

Mammography is an established imaging method for breast cancer screening because it has accuracy but has low sensitivity [7]. This is because the mammary parenchyma of women is different due to different parameters [8]. Also, mammography is successful among Caucasian women [3]. However, Chinese women have comparatively smaller and dense breasts and have greater parenchymal density than Caucasian women [9]. Mammography has lower sensitivity for dense tissues of the breast [10] and ultrasound is a cost-effective and more sensitive imaging method for dense tissues of the breast [11]. Therefore, in China ultrasound is a more frequently used method than mammography for the detection of breast cancer [3]. The Chinese government is started breast cancer screening by ultrasound in rural areas [3].

The objectives of retrospective analysis of cross-sectional study were to provide evidence and assessment of breast parenchymal patterns of ultrasonography for breast cancer detection among Chinese women considering those of women with cytopathology confirmed breast cancer as a reference standard.

Methods

Inclusion criteria

Women who underwent ultrasound examinations for breast cancer screening were included in the analyses.

Exclusion criteria

Women who underwent breast cancer surgeries, estrogen replacement therapy, and have incomplete data in the institutional records were excluded from the study.

Ultrasound examination

In a lateral or supine position with raised arms, fully exposed breasts, and axillae conditions of women, ultrasound examinations were performed. EPIQ 5 (Koninklijke Philips N.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands), M8 (Mindray Medical International Limited, Nanshan, Shenzhen, China), and iU22 (Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands) ultrasound devices were preferred to examine women. Linear array probes for 5–13 MHz, 6.6–13 MHz, and 7.5–10 MHz respectively were used. All examinations were performed by seven sonographer physicians (minimum 3-years experiences of institutes). Multi-angle and multi-plane ultrasound scans were performed for bilateral breasts and axillae. Two mutually orthogonal planes were used for confirmation of all lesions. The characteristics of the breast parenchyma and ultrasound images of all lesions were recorded. The images were taken at the same location in each breast.

Breast biopsies

Ultrasound-guided core biopsies were performed using an 18 G needle (BD Biosciences, Chicago, IL, USA) [12]. Core biopsies were performed by pathologists (minimum 3-years of experience of institutes).

Breast tissues histopathology

Breast tissue histopathology was performed by pathologists (minimum 3-years of experience of institutes). The diagnosis of breast cancer was confirmed by breast tissue histopathology.

Ultrasonographic classification

The thickness of the breast, ducts, fat lobules, and fibro glandular tissues were examined by ultrasonography. According to compositions of ducts, the thickness of the breast, diameter of ducts, fat lobules, and fibro glandular tissues, the breast parenchymatous pattern was categorized into 4 types: heterogeneous category: the inner diameters of ducts were less than 50% of a thick mass of the breast, the hypo-echoic fatty mass of the breast, less dense iso-echoic fibro glandular tissue, and hypo-echoic ductal ingredients. Ductal category: the inner diameters of ducts was more than 50% of the thick mass of the breast, hypo-echoic ductal ingredients in the mesh structure. Mixed category: the inner diameters of ducts was 50% of the thick mass of the breast, iso-echoic fibro glandular tissue, and hypo-echoic ductal ingredients. Fibrous category: the inner diameters of ducts was less than 50% of the thick mass of the breast, dense iso-echoic fibro glandular tissue, and less hypo-echoic ductal ingredients [3]. The different breast parenchymatous pattern categories are presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Ultrasonographic classification. a heterogeneous category (high percentage of fatty tissues), b ductal category (the inner diameters of ducts > 50% of the thick mass of the breast), c Mixed category (the inner diameters of ducts was 50% of the thick mass of the breast), and d Fibrous category (a dense classification of the breast)

Statistical analysis

SPSS 26.0 IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA was used for statistical analyses. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for categorical data and the Fischer exact test or Chi-square test of Independence was used for continuous data. All results were considered significant if p < 0.05, odds ratio (OR) with 95% of confidence interval (Cl). Cohen’s k was evaluated for agreements among sonographer physicians. Values were 0 ≤ k ≥ 0.4: poor agreement, 0.41 ≤ k ≥ 0.75: fair to good agreement, 0.76 ≤ k > 1.0: excellent agreement, k = 1.0: perfect agreement [13].

Results

Study population

A total of 6,125 Chinese women have undergone ultrasound examinations at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China and the Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China from 15 April 2015 to 13 May 2019. Three women underwent breast cancer surgeries, two women underwent estrogen replacement therapy, and five women have no complete data in the institutional records. Therefore, data of these women (n = 10) were excluded from the study. Among 6,115 women, 541 women had cytopathological confirmed breast cancer. From 5,574 cytopathological not confirmed breast cancer women, data of 849 age-matched women were randomly selected for the study. The demographical, social, and clinical conditions of women are presented in Table 1. The flow diagram of the study is presented in Fig. 2.

Table 1 The demographical, social, and clinical conditions of women who underwent ultrasound examination and selected for study
Fig. 2
figure2

Flow diagram of the study

Ultrasound examination

Heterogeneous and fibrous categories were higher among women who have cytopathological confirmed breast cancer than those who have not cytopathological confirmed breast cancer (p < 0.0001 for both). However, mixed type and ductal categories were the same among women who have cytopathological confirmed breast cancer and those who have not cytopathological confirmed breast cancer. The breast parenchymatous pattern categories shown in ultrasound examinations are reported in Table 2. Heterogeneous and fibrous categories were high-risk ultrasonographic examination categories for breast cancer. The OR is highest for the heterogeneous category followed by the fibrous category.

Table 2 Ultrasound examination

Agreements among sonographer physicians

Agreements among sonographer physicians for categories of ultrasonic examinations were fair to good (Table 3).

Table 3 Agreements among sonographer physicians

Discussion

The current study reported that heterogeneous and fibrous categories were high-risk ultrasonographic examination categories for breast cancer. The results of the breast parenchymatous pattern categories of the current study were agreed with those of an available study [3], retrospective studies [14, 15], and case–control study [16]. The heterogeneous category in the current study was included a high percentage of fatty tissues. The higher amount of breast fatty tissue independent of the other risk factors is associated with the risk of breast cancer [16]. The fibrous category in the current study was included a dense classification of the breast. Atypical epithelial hyperplasia is associated with the risk of breast cancer [17]. The distribution of ultrasonographic parenchymatous patterns is different between women who have cytopathological confirmed breast cancer and those who have not cytopathological confirmed breast cancer.

The study reported fair to good agreements among sonographer physicians for categories of ultrasonic examinations. The results of agreements between sonographer physicians for categories of ultrasonic examinations were parallel with those of an available study [3] and prospective study [13]. The use of three different ultrasound machines, seven sonographer physicians as reader, and the use of manual reading of ultrasound images were responsible for the lower agreement.

There are several limitations of the study, for example, the correlation between ultrasonographic parenchymatous pattern and mammographic parenchymatous pattern were not discussed. The possible justification is that by adding mammography there was an addition of extra cost on women’s heads. The retrospective nature of the study and lack of prospective study.

Conclusions

Breast ultrasound examinations are associated with breast cancer in asymptomatic women. Heterogeneous and fibrous categories of parenchymatous pattern of breast tissues were high-risk ultrasonographic examination categories for breast cancer. The ultrasonographic parenchymatous pattern could be used for screening breast cancer in asymptomatic Chinese women. If questionnaires and ultrasound examinations were performed in the early stage of breast cancer, it is possible to control the spoil of life of women due to breast cancer. The study data have the potential for the basis of breast cancer risk prediction.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets were used and analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

OR:

Odds ratio

Cl:

Confidence interval

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. 1.

    Yang Q, Yu X, Zhang W. Health variations among breast-cancer patients from different disease states: Evidence from China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hu Z, Li X, Feng MH, Chu JJ, Xie W. Models for risk assessment and prediction in breast cancer. Chinese J Epidemiol. 2009;30(10):1073–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hou XY, Niu HY, Huang XL, Gao Y. Correlation of breast ultrasound classifications with breast cancer in Chinese women. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42(11):2616–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang L, Liu L, Lou Z, Ding L, Guan H, Wang F, Yu L, Xiang Y, Zhou F, Xue F, Yu Z. Risk prediction for breast cancer in Han Chinese women based on a cause-specific Hazard model. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Evans DG, Howell A. Can the breast screening appointment be used to provide risk assessment and prevention advice? Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhu C, Wang L, Du LB, Li J, Zhang J, Dai M, Shi JF. The accuracy of mammography screening for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Chinese J Epidemiol. 2016;37(9):1296–305.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yaghjyan L, Mahoney MC, Succop P, Wones R, Buckholz J, Pinney SM. Relationship between breast cancer risk factors and mammographic breast density in the Fernald Community Cohort. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(5):996–1003.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bae JM, Kim EH. Breast density and risk of breast cancer in Asian women: A meta-analysis of observational studies. J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49(6):367–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    An P, Zhong S, Zhang R, Hou X, Xi R, Wang Y. A cross-sectional observational study to compare the role of ultrasound with mammography in women Identified at high risk for breast cancer in a population in China. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Shen S, Zhou Y, Xu Y, Zhang B, Duan X, Huang R, Li B, Shi Y, Shao Z, Liao H, Jiang J, Shen N, Zhang J, Yu C, Jiang H, Li S, Han S, Ma J, Sun Q. A multi-centre randomised trial comparing ultrasound vs mammography for screening breast cancer in high-risk Chinese women. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(6):998–1004.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Park CS, Kim SH, Jung NY, Choi JJ, Kang BJ, Jung HS. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions. Breast Cancer. 2015;22(2):153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kim WH, Lee SH, Chang JM, Cho N, Moon WK. Background echotexture classification in breast ultrasound: Inter-observer agreement study. Acta Radiol. 2017;58(12):1427–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Li H, Giger ML, Lan L, Janardanan J, Sennett CA. Comparative analysis of image-based phenotypes of mammographic density and parenchymal patterns in distinguishing between BRCA1/2 cases, unilateral cancer cases, and controls. J Med Imaging. 2014;1(3):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chen Q, Xia J, Zhang J. Identify the triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer by using texture features of medicale ultrasonic image: a STROBE-compliant study. Medicine. 2021;100(22):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lokate M, Peeters PH, Peelen LM, Haars G, Veldhuis WB, van Gils CH. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: the role of the fat surrounding the fibroglandular tissue. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(5):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ghosh K, Vachon CM, Pankratz VS, Vierkant RA, Anderson SS, Brandt KR, Visscher DW, Reynolds C, Frost MH, Hartmann LC. Independent association of lobular involution and mammographic breast density with breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(22):1716–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful for the radiological and non-radiological staff of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China and the Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

Funding

This study was supported by the Start-up Fund for scientific research of the Fujian Medical University (Grant No: 2017XQ1087).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have read and approved the manuscript for publication. ZB and YZ contributed equally to conceptualization, literature review, methodology, resources, and software of the study. SC contributed to investigation, literature review, methodology, resources, and supervision of the study. XC contributed to literature review, methodology, resources, validation, and software of the study. XX contributed to methodology, literature review, resources, data curation, and formal analyses of the study. LW contributed to methodology, literature review, validation, software, and supervision of the study. LC contributed to literature review, methodology, data curation of the study, draft, and edited the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongtao Bao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The designed protocol (FJPHBCS_1224 dated 23 January 2020) was approved by the Fujian Medical University review board and the Chinese Society of Radiology. The study reporting adheres to the law of China and the V2008 Declarations of Helsinki. Informed consent was not required from women because the study is a retrospective analysis.

Consent to publication

Informed consent was not required from women regarding publication because the study is a retrospective analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bao, Z., Zhao, Y., Chen, S. et al. Evidence and assessment of parenchymal patterns of ultrasonography for breast cancer detection among Chinese women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Imaging 21, 152 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00687-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Breast cancer risk
  • Breast density
  • Breast cancer screening
  • Breast parenchymatous tissue
  • Chinese women
  • Ultrasound