This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Exposure of the Swiss population to computed tomography
© Aroua et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 20 December 2012
Accepted: 25 July 2013
Published: 30 July 2013
The frequency of CT procedures has registered a significant increase over the last decade, which led at the international level to an increasing concern on the radiological risk associated with the use of CT especially in paediatrics. This work aimed at investigating the use of computed tomography in Switzerland, following the evolution of CT frequency and dose data over a decade and comparing it to data reported in other countries.
The frequency and dose data related to CT are obtained by means of a nationwide survey. National frequencies were established by projecting the collected data, using the ratio of the number of CT units belonging to the respondents to the total number of CT units in the country. The effective doses per examination were collected during an auditing campaign.
In 2008 about 0.8 Million CT procedures (~ 100 CT examinations / 1000 population) were performed in the country, leading to a collective effective dose of more than 6000 man.Sv (0.8 mSv/caput). In a decade the frequency of CT examinations averaged over the population and the associated average effective dose per caput increased by a factor of 2.2 and 2.9 respectively.
Although the contribution of CT to the total medical X-rays is 6% in terms of the frequency, it represents 68% in terms of the collective effective dose. These results are comparable to those reported in a number of countries in Europe and America with similar health level.
Medical X-rays represent a major source of man-made irradiation of the population. In its 2010 Report, the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) indicated that although diagnostic radiology represents at the global level only 20% of the total annual per caput effective dose, it accounts for more than 94% of the man-made component . In Switzerland diagnostic radiology was responsible in 2009 for 30% of the dose received by the population, but more that 92% of man-made irradiation . This is why the exposure of the population by radiodiagnostics is periodically monitored (each 5–10 years) both at global and national level by UNSCEAR and national radiation protection authorities respectively. In Switzerland this monitoring has been guaranteed for decades by the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) and delegated to a research institute [3–6].
The frequency of computed tomography (CT) procedures has registered a significant increase over the last decade. This is due not only to evolution of the demographics and the ageing of the population, but may be attributed also to the technology advance in CT devices, particularly the introduction of multi-slice CT, which opened a new field of vascular investigations and led to the change of medical practice by often replacing fluoroscopy guided procedures with CT scans and to the proliferation of CT units in emergency departments.
CT is now contributing significantly to the total collective dose due to medical X-rays. UNSCEAR  estimates the CT dose contribution for developed countries (health level I) to 47% during the period of the study (1997–2007), while recent works reported in six European countries and the USA indicate CT dose contributions ranging from 46% up to 80% of the total collective dose for the years 2006 to 2008 [7–13]. In parallel to the widespread of CT, there has been an increasing concern at the international level on the radiological risk associated the use of this radiological modality especially in paediatrics reflected in scientific literature .
The aim of this work was to investigate the use of CT in Switzerland, to assess the evolution of this modality in terms of frequency of examinations and associated collective dose over the past decade and to compare the Swiss situation with other countries of similar health level.
Materials and methods
All healthcare providers running an X-ray unit in Switzerland were addressed. This corresponds to 8,247 practices, radiology institutes and hospital departments, and 17,391 X-ray units authorized by the Regulatory Authority (FOPH). The participants were requested to provide their frequencies of examinations for the year 2008 in paper form by post mail, or in electronic form by email or by registration online. For this purpose, a dedicated website was developed (http://www.raddose.ch).
The Dose Datamed methodology explained in the European Guidance No 154  was used. The X-ray examinations were grouped into seven radiological modalities: radiography, conventional fluoroscopy, diagnostic interventional radiology, therapeutic interventional radiology, computed tomography, dental radiology, mammography, and bone densitometry. Concerning CT, the participants were asked to give the annual number of procedures related to over 50 types, or in case this was not possible, for about 20 broader categories. The participants were also allowed to provide data in their own format. The data received in local categories were redistributed over the reference categories.
National frequencies were established by projecting the collected data to the whole population. The results corresponding to the participants in the survey were multiplied by the ratio of the number of CT units belonging to the participants to the total number of CT units in the country. The projection was performed separately for each category of healthcare provider (hospitals, practices, radiology institutes).
The effective doses associated to CT procedures were reviewed in an auditing campaign . The tissue weighting factors (wT) provided by the International Commission on Radiological Protection in its Publication 60  were used for the calculation of the effective dose. The effective dose was also calculated using wT provided by ICRP Publication 103 , for the purpose of comparison. For CT modality, the new wT resulted in a 2% increase of the collective dose. In the most recent investigation performed in the UK  a 2-3% decrease in the collective dose was registered for CT when using the new set of wT.
It is important to note here that for this survey no CT scans associated to SPECT/CT examinations or PET/CT examinations were taken into account, as they will be considered in a specific survey dedicated to the dose delivered in nuclear medicine .
The overall response rate was 45% in terms of number of X-ray units. It was 49% for radiology institutes and 63% for hospital departments.
2008 Swiss annual frequency and dose data for CT and all X-ray modalities (rounded values)
All X-ray modalities
Number of examinations (in thousands)
Number of examinations/1000 population
Collective dose (man.Sv)
Effective dose/caput (mSv)
Frequency and dose data for the main CT examinations in terms of frequency and dose
Number of procedures/1000 population
Effective dose (mSv)/examination
Effective dose/caput (mSv)
CT examinations performed in different healthcare providers in 2008
Regional hospitals and clinics
A study was conducted to assess the use of CT in Switzerland in the framework of a nationwide survey aiming at estimating the exposure of the population to medical X-rays. The 5–10 years periodic survey is a robust tool for radiation protection in medicine and the good response rates obtained guaranty statistically significant results.
Comparison of 2008 frequency and dose data with previous surveys
Number of examinations/1000 population
2008/1998 CT frequency and dose ratios
The increase in the number of CT examinations may be attributed partly to the 27% increase in the number of CT units in a decade (187 in 1998 and 238 in 2008), and partly to the technology advance in CT scanners that led to the change of medical practice with new indications for CT and the replacement of some fluoroscopy guided procedures with CT scans. In fact, the increase of the frequency of CT procedures is accompanied by a reduction in the number of diagnostic interventional procedures and radiography . On the other hand the increase of the average effective dose per caput is due not only to the increase of the frequency of CT examinations, but also to the increase of the average effective dose per CT procedure.
Number of CT examinations (N CT ) and effective dose due to CT (E CT ) in various countries
% of total number of X-ray examinations
% of total effective dose
United Kingdom (2008)
The Netherlands (2008)
This investigation revealed that in 2008 the annual frequency of CT examinations performed in Switzerland was 0.78 Million, corresponding to 100 examinations per 1000 population. This is responsible for a collective effective dose of 6150 man.Sv or an average effective dose of 0.8 mSv/caput. From 1998 to 2008 the CT average frequency of examinations registered an increase of a factor 2.2 and the associated average effective dose increased by a factor 2.9. Computed tomography contributes 6% to the frequency of all medical X-rays and 68% to the total collective effective dose. This makes of CT the most irradiating radiological modality and the main contributor to the population dose due to radiodiagnostics, which is the case in other countries of similar health level. Compared to those countries, Switzerland appeared to be a medium consumer of CT and the efforts already engaged in radiation protection, notably the justification and optimisation of CT procedures should be maintained and consolidated; this is so important since an increase of the number of CT procedures is expected in the future due to the ageing of the population and the increase in healthcare needs.
In 2008 about 0.8 Million computed tomography procedures (~ 100 CT examinations / 1000 population) were performed in Switzerland.
CT is the most irradiating radiological modality and the main contributor to the population dose due to radiodiagnostics.
Justification and optimisation of CT procedures should be maintained and consolidated.
This research project was jointly funded by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health and the Swiss National Science Foundation.
- United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: UNSCEAR Report 2008: Sources of Ionizing Radiation. 2010, New York: United NationsGoogle Scholar
- Federal Office of Public Health: 2009 Annual Report of the Radiological Protection Division. 2010, Bern: FOPHGoogle Scholar
- Mini RL: Dosisbestimmungen in der medizinischen Röntgendiagnostik. 1992, Kerzers: Verlag Max HuberGoogle Scholar
- Aroua A, Burnand B, Decka I, Vader JP, Valley JF: Nationwide survey on radiation doses in diagnostic and interventional radiology in Switzerland in 1998. Health Phys. 2002, 83 (1): 46-55. 10.1097/00004032-200207000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aroua A, Decka I, Burnand B, Vader JP, Valley JF: Dosimetric aspects of a national survey of diagnostic and interventional radiology in Switzerland. Medical Phys. 2002, 29 (10): 2247-2259. 10.1118/1.1508380.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aroua A, Vader JP, Valley JF, Verdun FR: Exposure of the Swiss population by radiodiagnostics: 2003 review. Health Phys. 2007, 92 (5): 442-448. 10.1097/01.HP.0000254846.47107.9d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Etard C, Sinno-Tellier S, Aubert B: Exposure of French Population by Ionizing Radiation due to Medical Diagnostic Examinations in 2007 (in French). Joint Report of the Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire and the Institut de Veille. 2010, Paris: SanitaireGoogle Scholar
- Bernhard-Ströl C, Hachenberger C, Trugenberger-Schnabel A, Peter J: Jahresbericht 2009 Umweltradioaktivität und Strahlenbelastung. 2010, Salzgitter: Bundesamt für StrahlenschutzGoogle Scholar
- Hart D, Wall BF, Hiller MC, Shrimpton PC: Frequency and Collective Dose for Medical and Dental X-ray Examinations in the UK, 2008. 2010, Chilton: Health Protection Agency. HPA-CECE-012Google Scholar
- De Waard IR, Stoop P: Information System on Medical Radiation Applications: Data from the Reporting year 2008 (in Dutch). 2010, Bilthoven: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, RIVM Report 300081005Google Scholar
- Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority: Radiology in Norway Anno 2008. Trends in examination frequency and collective effective dose to the population. StrålevernRapport 2010:12. Østerås:. Language: Norwegian. 2010, Oslo: NRPAGoogle Scholar
- Järvinen H: Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK). Personal Communication. 2011, Helsinki: STUKGoogle Scholar
- National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements: Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States. NCRP Report No. 160. 2009, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
- Brenner DJ: Should we be concerned about the rapid increase in CT usage?. Rev Environ Health. 2010, 25 (1): 63-68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- European Commission: European Guidance on Estimating Population Doses from Medical X-ray Procedures. Radiation protection no. 154. 2008, Brussels: Directorate General for Energy and TransportGoogle Scholar
- Treier R, Aroua A, Verdun FR, Samara E, Stuessi A, Trueb PR: Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010, 142 (2–4): 244-254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- International Commission on Radiological Protection: The 1991 Recommendations of the ICRP. Publication 60. Ann ICRP. 1991, 21 (1): 3-Google Scholar
- International Commission on Radiological Protection: The 2007 Recommendations of the ICRP. Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007, 37 (2): 4-Google Scholar
- Roser H: University Hospital of Basel. Personal communication. 2011, BaselGoogle Scholar
- Aroua A, Samara ET, Bochud FO, Vader JP, Verdun FR: Exposure of the Swiss population by Medical X-rays: 2008 Review. Joint Report. 2011, Lausanne: University Institute of Applied Radiation Physics and University Institute of Social and Preventive MedicineGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/13/22/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.