Peer Review reports
From: Comparison of 96-kV and 120-kV cone-beam CT for the assessment of cochlear implants
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 May 2023 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 8 Jun 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Iris Burck |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Jun 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 7 Jul 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Iris Burck |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 7 Jul 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 31 Jan 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ralf Schulze |
| 11 Feb 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Sieber |
| 13 Mar 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Iris Burck |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 13 Mar 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 13 Mar 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Iris Burck |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 13 Mar 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 21 Mar 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ralf Schulze |
| 24 Mar 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Sieber |
| 28 Apr 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Iris Burck |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 28 Apr 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 13 May 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Iris Burck |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 13 May 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 Jun 2024 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 Jun 2024 | Article published | 10.1186/s12880-024-01322-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.