Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinicopathological parameters between training and validation cohorts

From: Development and validation of a multi-modal ultrasomics model to predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Parameters

Training cohort (n = 74)

Validation cohort (n = 32)

P-value

Sex

  

0.739

 Male

51(48.11%)

21(19.81%)

 

 Female

23(21.70%)

11(10.38%)

 

Age

  

0.907

 ≤ 60

54(50.94%)

23 (21.70%)

 

 > 60

20(18.87%)

9(8.49%)

 

Location (cm)

  

0.246

 ≤ 5

42(39.62%)

22(20.75%)

 

 5–10

32(30.19%)

10(9.43%)

 

Size (cm)

  

0.077

 ≤ 5

53(50.00%)

28(26.42%)

 

 > 5

21(19.81%)

4(3.77%)

 

TRG

  

0.087

 0

19(17.92%)

7(6.60%)

 

 1

15(14.15%)

10(9.43%)

 

 2

34(32.08%)

10(9.43%)

 

 3

6(5.66%)

5(4.72%)

 

Clinical stage

  

0.344

 II

3(2.83%)

3(2.83%)

 

 III

55(51.89%)

25(23.58%)

 

 IV

16(15.09%)

4(3.77%)

 

T stage

  

0.881

 T_2

5(4.72%)

3(2.83%)

 

 T_3

49(46.23%)

20(18.87%)

 

 T_4

20(18.87%)

9(8.49%)

 

N stage

  

0.867

 N_0

15(14.15%)

8(7.55%)

 

 N_1

19(17.92%)

8(7.55%)

 

 N_2

39(36.79%)

15(14.15%)

 

 N_3

1(0.94%)

1(0.94%)

 

Distant-metastasis

  

0.270

 No

58(54.72%)

28(26.42%)

 

 Yes

16(15.09%)

4(3.77%)

 

CEA (ng/ml)

  

0.008

 ≤ 5

28(26.42%)

21(19.81%)

 

 > 5

46(43.40%)

11(10.38%)

 

CA199(ng/ml)

  

0.529

 ≤ 37

56(52.83%)

26(24.53%)

 

 > 37

18(16.98%)

6(5.66%)

 

CA242(U/ml)

  

0.613

 ≤ 20

50(47.17%)

20(18.87%)

 

 > 20

24(22.64%)

12(11.32%)

 
  1. TRG: tumor regression grade; Data in brackets are the percentage, and data outside brackets are the number of patients; Statistical significance was demonstrated by P < 0.05