Skip to main content

Table 3 Quantitative indexes comparisons of TI-RADS model (TM), Radiomics model (RM) and radiomics combined with TI-RADS model (RTM) in 5-fold cross-validation independent test dataset

From: Combining radiomics with thyroid imaging reporting and data system to predict lateral cervical lymph node metastases in medullary thyroid cancer

Model

AUC

ACC

SEN

SPE

PPV

NPV

MCC

F1

TM

 fold 1

0.64

0.56

0.67

0.45

0.54

0.59

0.12

0.6

 fold 2

0.66

0.58

0.8

0.39

0.53

0.69

0.21

0.64

 fold 3

0.77

0.67

0.86

0.5

0.62

0.79

0.38

0.72

 fold 4

0.66

0.56

0.71

0.41

0.54

0.6

0.13

0.61

 fold 5

0.66

0.57

0.75

0.36

0.56

0.57

0.12

0.64

 Average

0.68

0.59

0.76

0.42

0.56

0.65

0.19

0.64

RM

 fold 1

0.76

0.67

0.62

0.73

0.68

0.67

0.35

0.65

 fold 2

0.72

0.67

0.6

0.74

0.67

0.68

0.34

0.63

 fold 3

0.85

0.7

0.76

0.64

0.67

0.74

0.4

0.71

 fold 4

0.85

0.74

0.81

0.68

0.71

0.79

0.49

0.76

 fold 5

0.73

0.65

0.67

0.64

0.67

0.64

0.3

0.67

 Average

0.78

0.69

0.69

0.69

0.68

0.7

0.38

0.68

RTM

 fold 1

0.82

0.77

0.71

0.82

0.79

0.75

0.54

0.75

 fold 2

0.8

0.7

0.65

0.74

0.68

0.71

0.39

0.66

 fold 3

0.9

0.81

0.9

0.73

0.76

0.89

0.64

0.82

 fold 4

0.83

0.79

0.71

0.86

0.83

0.76

0.59

0.77

 fold 5

0.75

0.65

0.67

0.64

0.67

0.64

0.3

0.67

 Average

0.82

0.74

0.73

0.76

0.75

0.75

0.49

0.73

Significance level of Delong test results for different models

 Test dataset

TM & RM

TM & RTM

RM & RTM

 All (5-fold)

0.030

<0.001

0.077

  1. The bold value represents the best value of a quantitative index