Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance of the machine learning-based classifications

From: Machine learning-based MRI radiomics for assessing the level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study

Ā 

AUC

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity

T2WI

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Logistic regression

0.746 (0.630, 0.863)

69.1 (68.5, 69.7)

83.3 (70.0, 96.7)

57.9 (42.2, 73.6)

Random forest

0.754 (0.635, 0.872)

73.5 (73.0, 74.1)

63.3 (46.1, 80.6)

81.6 (69.3, 93.9)

SVM

0.688 (0.556, 0.820)

70.6 (70.0, 71.2)

73.3 (57.5, 89.2)

68.4 (53.6, 83.2)

ceT1WI

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Logistic regression

0.820 (0.718, 0.922)

77.9 (77.4,78.4)

56.7 (38.9, 74.4)

94.7 (87.6, 100)

Random forest

0.771 (0.659, 0.884)

72.1 (71.5,72.6)

80.0 (65.7, 94.3)

65.8 (50.7, 80.9)

SVM

0.782 (0.661, 0.902)

77.9 (77.4, 78.4)

83.3 (70.0, 96.7)

73.7 (59.7, 87.7)

T2WIā€‰+ā€‰ceT1WI

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Logistic regression

0.846 (0.750, 0.943)

80.9 (80.4, 81.3)

80.0 (65.7, 94.3)

81.6 (69.3, 93.9)

Random forest

0.813 (0.703, 0.924)

79.4 (78.9, 79.9)

73.3 (57.5, 89.2)

84.2 (72.6, 95.8)

SVM

0.822 (0.721, 0.923)

77.9 (77.4, 78.4)

76.7 (61.5, 91.8)

78.9 (66.0, 91.9)

  1. Data are presented as percentages except AUC; 95% CIs are included in parentheses
  2. AUC: area under the curve; CI: confidence interval; SVM: support vector machine