Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical and 18F-FDG PET/CT image parameter comparisons between invasion thymoma and anterior mediatinal lymphoma patients

From: A diagnostic model based on 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in improving the differential diagnosis of invasive thymic epithelial tumors and anterior mediastinal lymphomas

Histopathologic Diagnosis

Invasive TETs (n = 61, mean \(\varvec{\pm }\) SD)

Anterior mediatinal lymphomas (n = 72, mean \(\varvec{\pm }\) SD)

\(\varvec{X}^{\varvec{2}}\varvec{/t/Z}\)

p value

Age (years, mean ± SD)

55.84 ± 11.43

28.97 ± 10.37

-14.20

<0.001

Gender

     Male

33

40

0.028

0.866

     Female

28

32

Location

     No offset

37

65

16.21

<0.001

     Offset

24

7

Tumor longest diameter (cm)

6.72 ± 2.99

7.99 ± 1.83

3.02

0.003

SUVmax

7.63 ± 4.58

15.68 ± 8.18

6.83

<0.001

Tumor Border

     Blurred

45

54

0.026

0.871

     Sharp

16

18

Peripheral Vascular Structure

     Encompass

9

25

6.919

0.009

     Infiltrate

52

47

Calcification

     Yes

18

0

24.571

<0.001

     No

43

72

Distant metastasis

     Yes

33

26

5.137

0.023

     No

27

46

 

Metastatic below diaphragm lymph node

     Yes

7

19

  

     No

54

53

3.602

0.057

Splenic involvementa

     Yes

0

21

  

     No

61

51

-

<0.001

  1. CT computer tomography, SUVmax maximum standardized uptake value
  2. aFisher’s exact test