Table 4 Interobserver and intraobserver reliability evaluated by ICC
From: EOS® is reliable to evaluate spinopelvic parameters: a validation study
Reliability | Study | Parameter | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TK | LL | PT | SS | PI | SVA | ||
Interobserver | Conventional | 0.923 (0.864–0.957) | 0.871 (0.773–0.927) | 0.947 (0.906–0.970) | 0.885 (0.797–0.935) | 0.935 (0.885–0.963) | 0.980 (0.965–0.989) |
EOS® | 0.956 (0.922–0.975) | 0.952 (0.916–0.973) | 0.921 (0.861–0.955) | 0.909 (0.840–0.948) | 0.940 (0.895–0.966) | 0.988 (0.979–0.993) | |
Intraobserver | Conventional | 0.992 (0.987–0.996) | 0.989 (0.981–0.994) | 0.971 (0.949–0.983) | 0.997 (0.995–0.998) | 0.990 (0.982–0.994) | 0.999 (0.998–0.999) |
EOS® | 0.996 (0.994–0.998) | 0.996 (0.993–0.998) | 0.995 (0.991–0.998) | 0.986 (0.976–0.992) | 0.998 (0.996–0.999) | 0.996 (0.993–0.998) | |