From: EOS® is reliable to evaluate spinopelvic parameters: a validation study
Reviewer | Imaging | Parameter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TK | LL | PT | SS | PI | SVA | ||
Radiologist | Conventional | 31.07 ± 10.73 | 41.54 ± 16.13 | 16.90 ± 8.97 | 32.42 ± 10.13 | 49.18 ± 13.17 | 7.35 ± 10.09 |
EOS® | 29.32 ± 12.08 | 43.40 ± 16.22 | 15.44 ± 8.61 | 32.88 ± 9.28 | 48.08 ± 13.51 | 8.84 ± 9.29 | |
P value | 0.4481 | 0.5671 | 0.4091 | 0.8131 | 0.6811 | 0.4482 | |
Orthopedic Surgeon | Conventional | 29.83 ± 11.71 | 42.85 ± 14.11 | 18.42 ± 9.55 | 32.04 ± 11.20 | 50.54 ± 14.38 | 6.94 ± 10.18 |
EOS® | 29.52 ± 12.43 | 41.56 ± 15.69 | 17.10 ± 10.39 | 32.99 ± 10.21 | 49.92 ± 14.36 | 8.98 ± 9.12 | |
P value | 0.8981 | 0.7141 | 0.3651 | 0.6591 | 0.8282 | 0.3022 | |
P value* | 0.5841 | 0.6671 | 0.3601 | 0.8591 | 0.6272 | 0.8421 | |
P value† | 0.9351 | 0.6071 | 0.4701 | 0.9551 | 0.5431 | 0.8552 |