Skip to main content

Table 3 Spinopelvic parameters as measured by the reviewers using conventional X-ray radiography and EOS®, and the comparison between them

From: EOS® is reliable to evaluate spinopelvic parameters: a validation study

Reviewer

Imaging

Parameter

TK

LL

PT

SS

PI

SVA

Radiologist

Conventional

31.07 ± 10.73

41.54 ± 16.13

16.90 ± 8.97

32.42 ± 10.13

49.18 ± 13.17

7.35 ± 10.09

EOS®

29.32 ± 12.08

43.40 ± 16.22

15.44 ± 8.61

32.88 ± 9.28

48.08 ± 13.51

8.84 ± 9.29

P value

0.4481

0.5671

0.4091

0.8131

0.6811

0.4482

Orthopedic Surgeon

Conventional

29.83 ± 11.71

42.85 ± 14.11

18.42 ± 9.55

32.04 ± 11.20

50.54 ± 14.38

6.94 ± 10.18

EOS®

29.52 ± 12.43

41.56 ± 15.69

17.10 ± 10.39

32.99 ± 10.21

49.92 ± 14.36

8.98 ± 9.12

P value

0.8981

0.7141

0.3651

0.6591

0.8282

0.3022

 

P value*

0.5841

0.6671

0.3601

0.8591

0.6272

0.8421

 

P value

0.9351

0.6071

0.4701

0.9551

0.5431

0.8552

  1. 1: Independent samples t-test. 2: Mann Whitney U test
  2. *: Comparison of conventional X-ray between reviewers
  3. †: Comparison of EOS® between reviewers