Peer Review reports
From: EOS® is reliable to evaluate spinopelvic parameters: a validation study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sep 2023 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 Sep 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hong Jin Kim |
| 24 Sep 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 1 Nov 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Seyedehsan Daneshmand |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 1 Nov 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 Nov 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hong Jin Kim |
| 11 Nov 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 27 Nov 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Seyedehsan Daneshmand |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Nov 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Nov 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Seyedehsan Daneshmand |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 28 Nov 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 9 Dec 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Seyedehsan Daneshmand |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Dec 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Dec 2023 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Feb 2024 | Article published | 10.1186/s12880-023-01178-0 |
You can find further information about peer review here.