Table 2 Comparison of diagnostic method efficacy by mass-size group and among the entire cohort
From: Value of inversion imaging to diagnosis in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses
Diagnostic Method | AUC | Accuracy, % | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | PPV, % | NPV, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BI-RADS | 0.909 (0.880–0.938) | 84.2 (80.5–87.9) | 86.1 (82.6–89.6) | 81.5 (77.6–85.4) | 86.9 (83.5–90.4) | 80.4 (76.3–84.5) |
IS P* | 0.849 (0.809–0.889) < 0.001 | 78.2 (74.0–82.4) < 0.001 | 75.9 (71.5–80.3) < 0.001 | 81.5 (77.6–85.4) > 0.05 | 85.4 (81.8–89.0) < 0.001 | 70.3 (65.6–75.0) < 0.001 |
BI-RADS + IS P* | 0.927 (0.899–0.956) < 0.001 | 88.6 (85.4–91.8) < 0.001 | 91.2 (88.3–94.1) < 0.001 | 84.8 (81.1–88.5) < 0.001 | 89.5 (86.3–92.7) < 0.001 | 87.1 (83.6–90.6) < 0.001 |