Table 4 Comparison of model estimates and the reference standard of the three parameters in the test set
From: Deep learning model for measuring the sagittal Cobb angle on cervical spine computed tomography
Method | ICC | r | MAE (°) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internal test set | Four-points method | 0.75 (0.68, 0.81) | 0.64 (0,49,0.81) | 5.42 (3.96,7.26) |
Line-fitting method | 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) | 0.94 (0.91,0.97) | 3.23 (2.84,3.69) | |
External test set | Four-points method | 0.74 (0.60,0.82) | 0.66 (0.55,0.95) | 5.25 (3.01,8.58) |
Line-fitting method | 0.80 (0.71,0.87) | 0.74 (0.66,0.94) | 4.68 (3.00,7.40) |