Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of quantitative parameters among ESCC of different degrees of differentiation in AP and VP

From: Spectral CT - a new supplementary method for preoperative assessment of pathological grades of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Phase

Group

n

VMI40keV

IC (mg/ml)

WC (mg/ml)

Eff-Z

λHU

AP

Well differentiated ESCC

27

137.85 ± 25.18

13.66 ± 3.13

1024.74 ± 7.19

8.43 ± 0.17

2.58 ± 0.59

Moderately differentiated ESCC

82

162.81 ± 45.75

16.49 ± 5.29

1026.35 ± 5.92

8.58 ± 0.28

3.12 ± 1.00

Poorly differentiated ESCC

82

172.18 ± 44.41

17.65 ± 5.13

1026.13 ± 8.60

8.64 ± 0.27

3.33 ± 1.00

 F Value

 

6.518

6.563

0.504

6.907

6.554

P Value

 

0.002

0.002

0.605

0.001

0.002

VP

Well differentiated ESCC

27

192.66 ± 29.44

19.85 ± 3.59

1028.66 ± 5.80

8.76 ± 0.18

3.74 ± 0.68

Moderately differentiated ESCC

82

210.98 ± 80.27

21.31 ± 4.58

1027.24 ± 9.21

8.84 ± 0.24

4.27 ± 2.46

Poorly differentiated ESCC

82

234.88 ± 44.03

24.88 ± 5.15

1029.18 ± 7.53

9.01 ± 0.24

4.70 ± 0.97

 F Value

 

5.987

17.217

1.213

3.277

17.877

P Value

 

0.003

0.000

0.300

0.040

0.000

  1. Except for the F and P-values, data are reported as mean ± standard deviation.
  2. ESCC Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, AP Arterial phase, VP Venous phase, VMI Virtual monoenergetic image, IC Iodine concentration, WC Water concentration, Eff-Z Effective atomic number; λHU, the slope of the spectral curve.