Skip to main content

Table 2 Diagnostic performance analysis of LR, DT and GBDT models

From: Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT

Classifier

Group

Sensitivity (95%CI)

Specificity (95%CI)

Accuracy (95%CI)

PPV

NPV

AUC (95%CI)

LR

Training cohort

0.918(0.839–0.996)

0.492(0.400-0.584)

0.792(0.729–0.855)

0.426

0.933

0.815 (0.744–0.885)

Internal validation cohort

0.941(0.840-1.000)

0.437(0.312–0.576)

0.792(0.744–0.841)

0.417

0.955

0.815 (0.602–0.904)

External test cohort

0.852(0.678–0.999)

0.688(0.573–0.803)

0.818(0.732–0.964)

0.424

0.956

0.910 (0.810–0.978)

DT

Training cohort

0.966(0.914–0.997)

0.639(0.551–0.727)

0.870(0.818–0.922)

0.525

0.979

0.883 (0.826–0.941)

Internal validation cohort

0.941(0.840–0.996)

0.429(0.290–0.568)

0.790(0.695–0.885)

0.414

0.944

0.803 (0.587–0.845)

External test cohort

0.787(0.586–0.988)

0.500(0.376–0.625)

0.727(0.628–0.826)

0.289

0.901

0.700 (0.545–0.856)

GBDT

Training cohort

0.986(0.952–0.997)

0.770(0.693–0.847)

0.923(0.882–0.964)

0.639

0.993

0.981 (0.957-1.000)

Internal validation cohort

0.882(0.744-1.000)

0.714(0.588–0.841)

0.833(0.746–0.920)

0.570

0.934

0.815 (0.704–0.920)

External test cohort

0.918(0.784–0.999)

0.563(0.442–0.687)

0.844(0.764–0.925)

0.352

0.964

0.819 (0.686–0.952)

  1. LR, Logistic regression; DT, Decision tree; GBDT, Gradient boosting decision tree; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval, NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value