Table 6 The performance of CACS, Radscore and radiomics nomogram
Models | Cohorts | AUC (95% CI) | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACS | Training cohort | 0.75(0.69–0.80) | 69.4% | 73.5% | 67.5% | 52.1% | 84.1% |
Validation cohort | 0.73(0.64–0.82) | 71.4% | 62.5% | 74.6% | 46.3% | 85.0% | |
Radscore | Training cohort | 0.80(0.75–0.85) | 75.8% | 71.8% | 77.8% | 60.9% | 85.1% |
Validation cohort | 0.82(0.75–0.90) | 75.3% | 75.0% | 75.4% | 51.7% | 89.6% | |
Radiomics nomogram | Training cohort | 0.81(0.76–0.86) | 75.0% | 76.1% | 74.5% | 58.9% | 86.6% |
Validation cohort | 0.83(0.76–0.90) | 76.0% | 75.0% | 76.3% | 52.6% | 89.7% |