Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparisons of detection performance and inference speed for YOLOV4-tiny-3 l by using the proposed and baseline approach on model development test set data

From: Tile-based microscopic image processing for malaria screening using a deep learning approach

Model

Tile size

AP (%)

R (%)

Time (sec/img)

Train

Inference

YOLOV4-tiny-3l@416

1088 \(\times\) 1088

1088 \(\times\) 1088

55.4

59.8

1.0

832 \(\times\) 832

65.9

71.2

1.0

608 \(\times\) 608

76.9

84.6

1.4

YOLOV4-tiny-3l@512

1088 \(\times\) 1088

1088 \(\times\) 1088

67.2

72.8

1.3

832 \(\times\) 832

78.0

84.3

1.4

608 \(\times\) 608

83.4

92.3

2.0

YOLOV4-tiny-3l@608

1088 \(\times\) 1088

1088 \(\times\) 1088

78.4

84.3

1.2

832 \(\times\) 832

86.1

93.0

1.6

608 \(\times\) 608

81.6

89.3

2.0

YOLOV4-tiny-3l@416

832 \(\times\) 832

1088 \(\times\) 1088

50.0

53.7

1.0

832 \(\times\) 832

64.3

70.0

1.0

608 \(\times\) 608

80.5

87.7

1.5

YOLOV4-tiny-3l@512

832 \(\times\) 832

1088 \(\times\) 1088

64.9

71.4

1.1

832 \(\times\) 832

78.1

84.5

1.4

608 \(\times\) 608

85.7

94.2

1.9

YOLOV4-tiny-3l@608

832 \(\times\) 832

1088 \(\times\) 1088

74.5

81.0

1.3

832 \(\times\) 832

85.4

92.6

1.6

608 \(\times\) 608

84.0

91.0

2.0

YOLOV4-tiny-3l@416

608 \(\times\) 608

1088 \(\times\) 1088

41.8

57.1

0.8

832 \(\times\) 832

64.4

71.4

1.0

608 \(\times\) 608

81.7

89.7

1.4

YOLOV4-tiny-3l@512

608 \(\times\) 608

1088 \(\times\) 1088

51.8

57.2

1.0

832 \(\times\) 832

74.6

81.1

1.3

608 \(\times\) 608

87.1

95.0

1.9

YOLOV4-tiny-3l@608

608 \(\times\) 608

1088 \(\times\) 1088

69.2

85.7

1.0

832 \(\times\) 832

83.8

91.9

1.4

608 \(\times\) 608

87.4

95.1

1.9

Without tiling

YoloV4-tiny-3l@416

–

–

71.46

71.0

0.2

YoloV4-tiny-3l@512

–

–

79.4

78.0

0.2

YoloV4-tiny-3l@608

–

–

78.73

76.0

0.2

  1. Bold values indicate the best-performing model