Skip to main content

Table 4 Subgroup analysis for the diagnostic performance of PET/CT in detecting pulmonary lesions

From: Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating pulmonary lesions: an updated meta-analysis of comparative studies

Characteristics

Studies (n)

Pooled sensitivity (95% Cl)

Pooled specificity (95% Cl)

Total

10

0.82 (0.70–0.90)

0.81 (0.72–0.87)

Year

  > 2011

6

0.86 (0.75–0.97)

0.81 (0.71–0.90)

  ≤ 2011

4

0.76 (0.59–0.93)

0.80 (0.69–0.92)

Design

 Retrospective

5

0.74 (0.58–0.90)

0.75 (0.65–0.84)

 Prospective

5

0.90 (0.81–0.99)

0.87 (0.79–0.95)

No. of nodules

  ≤ 100

6

0.81 (0.69–0.94)

0.84 (0.77–0.92)

  > 100

4

0.83 (0.69–0.98)

0.74 (0.61–0.86)

Lesion diameter*

 Only nodules(≤ 3 cm)

4

0.67 (0.58–0.76)

0.86 (0.80–0.92)

 Nodules and masses

2

0.97 (0.93–1.00)

0.82 (0.69–0.95)

Disease in the benign group

 Inflammation only

2

0.81 (0.60–1.00)

0.88 (0.76–1.00)

 Inflammation and tumors

8

0.82 (0.71–0.93)

0.79 (0.70–0.87)

 Parameter

 SUVmax

6

0.86 (0.75–0.97)

0.78 (0.68–0.88)

 SUV-CR

4

0.77 (0.60–0.93)

0.84 (0.74–0.94)

Reference standard

 His/Fol

7

0.75 (0.65–0.85)

0.82 (0.73–0.90)

 His

3

0.92 (0.84–0.99)

0.79 (0.65–0.93)

  1. Boldface type indicates P value is < 0.05 in subgroup analysis of sensitivity or specificity; His Histological, Fol Follow-up
  2. *Four studies were excluded from this subgroup due to lack of information on lesion diameter