Skip to main content

Table 1 main characteristics of 10 studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating pulmonary lesions: an updated meta-analysis of comparative studies

References

Inclusion interval

Country

Mean age (range)

Design

No. of patients (F/M)

No. of nodules

Magnetic strength

b-values (s/mm2)

Parameter

(DWI, PET)

Reference test

Ohno et al. [18]

2015.09–2016.08

Japan

70.3 (53–84)

Prospective

82 (30/52)

88

3.0T

1000

ADC, SUVmax

His/Fol

Nomori et al. [19]

2012.12–2014.03

Japan

–

Retrospective

77 (–/–)

87

1.5T

800

SI-CR, SUV-CR

His/Fol

Ohba et al. [24]

2007.10–2009.03

Japan

–

Prospective

58 (–/–)

76

3.0T, 1.5T

1000

ADC, SUV-CR

His/Fol

Mori et al. [25]

2006.02–2007.07

Japan

68 (20–80)

Retrospective

104 (49/55)

140

1.5T

1000

ADC, SUV-CR

His/Fol

Ohba et al. [8]

2006.02–2007.12

Japan

68 (36–82)

Retrospective

110 (54/56)

124

1.5T

1000

ADC, SUV-CR

His/Fol

Zhang et al. [26]

2010.09–2013.01

Chineses

59 (26–81)

Retrospective

113 (46/67)

108

3.0T

1000

ADC, SUVmax

His

Katsuo et al. [22]

2009.05–2012.02

Japan

68.5 (37–87)

Prospective

189 (65/124)

189

1.5T

800

ADC, SUVmax

His/Fol

Kang et al. [21]

2008.09–2009.06

Chineses

51 (39–78)

Retrospective

26 (5/21)

26

1.5T

600

ADC, SUVmax

His/Fol

Liu et al. [23]

2016.01–2018.06

Chineses

64.6 (–)

Prospective

36 (12/24)

36

3.0T

Total

ADC, SUVmax

His

Selcuk et al. [20]

2014–2017

Turkey

57.8 (36–85)

Prospective

76 (16/60)

74

1.5T

500

ADC, SUVmax

His

  1. His Histological, Fol Follow- up