Table 4 Comparison between cumulative diagnostic performance considering two different risks groups for each score: with or without the indeterminate score 3 for Hopkins and Deauville and score 4 for Cuneo criteria
Hopkins 1 (4,5 = progression) (%) | Hopkins 2 (3,4,5 = progression) (%) | Deauville 1 (4,5 = progression) (%) | Deauville 2 (3,4,5 = progression) (%) | Cuneo 1 (5,6 = progression) (%) | Cuneo 2 (4,5,6 = progression) (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity | 87 | 93 | 93 | 100 | 47 | 100 |
Specificity | 86 | 71 | 79 | 64 | 93 | 75 |
PPV | 76 | 64 | 70 | 60 | 78 | 68 |
NPV | 92 | 95 | 96 | 100 | 76 | 100 |
Accuracy | 86 | 79 | 84 | 77 | 77 | 84 |