Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of quantitative evaluations of mean ADC values (10 × −6 mm2/s)

From: Reproducibility and feasibility of optic nerve diffusion MRI techniques: single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI), readout-segmented EPI, and reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging

 

ROI1

ROI2

ROI3

F/χ2

P

Firsta

     

 rs-EPI DWI

1939.79 ± 432.73d

1344.62 ± 278.79d

1043.69 ± 199.62c

43.00e

< 0.001

 rFOV-DWI

1251.02 ± 209.81d

998.69 ± 168.511d

995.99 ± 139.73d

18.20f

< 0.001

 ss-EPI DWI

1744.47 ± 413.35d

1271.74 ± 310.28d

1088.33 ± 169.14d

36.54e

< 0.001

 F/χ2

27.77e

21.77e

9.80e

  

 P

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.008

  

Secondb

     

 rs-EPI DWI

1908.60 ± 337.60d

1335.59 ± 284.62d

1249.13 ± 256.82d

38.40f

< 0.001

 rFOV-DWI

1117.77 ± 277.55c

977.81 ± 94.24d

965.94 ± 116.86d

19.36e

< 0.001

 ss-EPI DWI

1675.44 ± 429.45d

1225.84 ± 221.47d

1034.00 ± 220.31c

23.66e

< 0.001

 F/χ2

29.96e

31.69e

24.92e

  

 P

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

  
  1. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; rs-EPI DWI, readout-segmented echo-planar imaging diffusion-weighted imaging; rFOV, reduced field-of-view; ss-EP, single-shot echo-planar imaging; ROI, region of interest
  2. aMean ADC values of the first scan
  3. bMean ADC values of the second scan
  4. cParameter value was a non-normal distribution, expressed as a median ± quartile range
  5. dParameter value was a normal distribution, expressed as mean ± standard deviation
  6. eχ2 value of Friedman’s test
  7. fF value of ANOVA