Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparative results of macrocalcification subgroups

From: Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for calcified benign thyroid nodules: results of over 5 years' follow-up

Variables

Strong group (n = 18)

Weak group (n = 12)

P value (2-tailed)

Age(years)

42.67 ± 10.68

45.08 ± 12.92

0.581

Sex (F/M)

13/5

8/4

1.000

Initial nodule volume(cm3)

5.70 ± 14.47

16.29 ± 34.61

0.459

Energy applied per volume (kJ/ml)

4.64 ± 5.93

3.28 ± 4.11

0.472

Vascularity

1.83 ± 0.92

2.50 ± 1.17

0.099

Location close to critical structure (Y/N)

6/12

6/6

0.458

VRR (%)

   

 1 month

− 111.46 ± 123.44

− 154.94 ± 136.30

0.329

 3 months

− 64.85 ± 218.10

28.68 ± 72.71

0.248

 6 months

37.49 ± 155.30

57.99 ± 72.06

0.194

 12 months

61.15 ± 48.36

83.98 ± 17.14

0.207

 24 months

74.42 ± 33.79

88.26 ± 19.97

0.088

 36 months

80.05 ± 28.67

94.88 ± 8.79

0.036a

 48 months

81.32 ± 24.52

95.44 ± 7.73

0.029a

 60 months

85.03 ± 19.52

94.73 ± 8.97

0.036a

  1. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD or frequency (number of nodules)
  2. p values were significantly different
  3. aComparison between the weak and strong macrocalcification subgroups