Study | Study design | Number of patients | Time of PET/CT | Thresholds for PET-CT parameters (relevant survival parameter) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bartel et al. [15] | Prospective | 239 | At diagnosis and before autologous SCT | nFL > 3 (OS and EFS), SUVmax > 3.9 (EFS*), EMD-positivity (OS* and EFS*) |
Zamagni et al. [8] | Prospective | 192 | At diagnosis | SUVmax > 4.2 (OS and PFS), EMD-positivity (OS and PFS), nFLs > 3 (PFS*) |
Fonti et al. [21] | Retrospective | 47 | At diagnosis, with subpopulation in relapse | MTV (OS and PFS) |
Usmani et al. [11] | Prospective | 302 | At diagnosis and at induction day 7 | nFL > 3 on day 7 (OS and PFS) |
Zamagni et al. [9] | Retrospective | 282 | After first line | SUVmax > 4.2 (PFS and OS), nFL > 3 (OS* and PFS*), EMD-positivity (OS* and PFS*) |
Patriarca et al. [10] | Retrospective | 67 | Before allogeneic SCT | SUVmax > 4.2 (OS and PFS*), EMD-positivity (OS* and PFS), nFL > 1 (OS* and PFS*), |
Beksac et al. [12] | Prospective | 139 | Before and after autologous SCT | SUVmax > 3.35 (OS), SUVmax > 4.2 (PFS) |
Moreau et al. [22] | Prospective | 134 | After first line compared to PET at diagnosis | PET-positive versus PET-normalization (PFS and OS) |
Davies et al. [14] | Retrospective (based on population of TT4-6 trials) | 596 | At diagnosis, during and after induction | nFL > 3 (OS, PFS) at diagnosis. Suppression of FL-signal beneficial |
Wang et al. [16] | Retrospective | 123 | At diagnosis | SUVmax > 5.7 (OS*), EMD-positivity (OS and PFS) |
Moon et al. [17] | Retrospective | 76 | At diagnosis | nFL > 3 (OS and PFS), EMD-positivity (OS and PFS) |
Fonti et al. [23] | Retrospective | 47 | At diagnosis | MVT (OS and PFS), TLG (OS* and PFS*), SUVmax (OS*), nFL (OS* and PFS*) |
Lapa et al. [18] | Retrospective | 37 | At relapse | nFL > 10 (TTP and OS), EMD (TTP and OS), SUVmax (ROC) > 18.5 (TTP) |
Jamet et al. [19] | Retrospective | 40 | At relapse | nFL (appendicular skeleton) > 6 (OS, PFS), TLG (OS), SUVmax (ROC) > 15.9 (PFS), nFLs > 13 (PFS*) |