Skip to main content

Table 2 Root proximity frequencies cross-tabulation comparing PAN to CBCT

From: The suitability of panoramic radiographs for clinical decision making regarding root angulation compared to cone-beam computed tomography

 

CBCT decision

PAN decision

Proximity present

Proximity absent

Total

Examiner 1

 Proximity present

5 (29.4%)

34 (4.3%)

39 (4.8%)

 Proximity absent

12 (70.6%)

756 (95.7%)

767 (95.2%)

 Total

17 (100%)

790 (100%)

807 (100%)

Examiner 2

 Proximity present

1 (20%)

28 (3.5%)

29 (3.6%)

 Proximity absent

4 (80%)

774 (96.5%)

778 (96.4%)

 Total

5 (100%)

802 (100%)

807 (100%)