Skip to main content

Table 1 Frequencies of clinical decisions cross-tabulation comparing PAN to CBCT decisions

From: The suitability of panoramic radiographs for clinical decision making regarding root angulation compared to cone-beam computed tomography

 

CBCT decision

PAN decision

Reposition

Don’t reposition

Missing

Dilacerated

Total

Examiner 1

 Reposition

103 (49.3%)

115 (18.7%)

0 (0%)

1 (20%)

219 (25%)

 Don’t reposition

104 (49.8%)

497 (80.9%)

0 (0%)

3 (60%)

604 (70%)

 Missing

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

35 (100%)

0 (0%)

35 (4.1%)

 Dilacerated

2 (1%)

2 (0.3%)

0 (0%)

1 (20%)

5 (0.6%)

 Total

209 (100%)

614 (100%)

35 (100%)

5 (100%)

863 (100%)

Examiner 2

 Reposition

47 (48.5%)

7 (10%)

0 (0%)

2 (22.2%)

121 (14%)

 Don’t reposition

47 (48.5%)

642 (88.9%)

0 (0%)

2 (22.2%)

691 (80.1%)

 Missing

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

35 (100%)

0 (0%)

35 (4.1%)

 Dilacerated

3 (3.1%)

8 (1.1%)

0 (0%)

5 (55.6%)

16 (1.9%)

 Total

97 (100%)

722 (100%)

35 (100%)

9 (100%)

863 (100%)