Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance of radiomic models built by the MLR and SVM for the training and validation cohorts

From: Radiomic model for differentiating parotid pleomorphic adenoma from parotid adenolymphoma based on MRI images

Radiomic model

AUC

(95% Cl)

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

F-1 score

T1WI model

The training cohort

MLR

0.85

(0.80–0.91)

0.81

0.82

0.80

0.83

0.78

0.82

SVM

0.95

(0.92–0.99)

0.92

0.92

0.92

0.94

0.90

0.92

The validation cohort

MLR

0.71

(0.81–0.91)

0.71

0.76

0.65

0.73

0.69

0.74

SVM

0.85

(0.77–0.94)

0.74

0.71

0.76

0.79

0.68

0.75

T2WI model

The training cohort

MLR

0.87

(0.80–0.95)

0.83

0.88

0.77

0.83

0.83

0.85

SVM

0.97

(0.95–0.99)

0.95

0.98

0.92

0.94

0.97

0.96

The validation cohort

MLR

0.85

(0.90–0.94)

0.80

0.86

0.71

0.78

0.80

0.82

SVM

0.74

(0.62–0.85)

0.68

0.76

0.59

0.70

0.67

0.73

T1-2WI model

The training cohort

MLR

0.95

(0.91–0.99)

0.86

0.90

0.82

0.86

0.86

0.88

SVM

0.96

(0.92–0.99)

0.92

0.96

0.87

0.90

0.94

0.93

The validation cohort

MLR

0.90

(0.85–0.95)

0.84

0.88

0.79

0.84

0.84

0.86

SVM

0.93

(0.87–0.99)

0.87

0.81

0.94

0.94

0.80

0.87

  1. PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; T1WI, T1-weighted imaging; T2WI, T2-weighted imaging; SVM, Support vector machine; MLR, multivariable logistic regression