Table 3 Quantitative result comparison of different models on the STARE

Zhao et al. [11]

0.7800

0.9780

0.9560

-

-

0.8700

Azzopardi et al. [13]

0.7716

0.9701

0.9497

-

-

0.9563

Fraz et al. [15]

0.7311

0.9680

0.9442

-

-

-

Wang et al. [19]

0.8104

0.9791

0.9621

-

-

0.9751

Jiang et al. [20]

0.8352

0.9846

0.9734

-

-

0.9900

Liskowski et al. [21]

0.8554

0.9862

0.9729

-

-

0.9928

Fu et al. [22]

0.7140

-

0.9536

-

-

-

Jin et al. [28]

0.7428

0.9920

0.9729

0.8856

-

0.9868

Alom et al. [33]

0.8108

0.9871

0.9706

-

0.8396

0.9909

Hu et al. [36]

0.7543

0.9814

0.9632

-

-

0.9751

Mo et al. [37]

0.8147

0.9844

0.9674

-

-

0.9885

Proposed method

0.8751

0.9894

0.9872

0.9856

0.8547

0.9941