Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Differentiation of Pseudoprogression from True Progressionin Glioblastoma Patients after Standard Treatment: A Machine Learning Strategy Combinedwith Radiomics Features from T1-weighted Contrast-enhanced Imaging

Original Submission
30 Jun 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Jul 2020 Author responded Author comments - yingzhi sun
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jul 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jul 2020 Author responded Author comments - yingzhi sun
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jul 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Aug 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 Sep 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 Sep 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Sep 2020 Author responded Author comments - yingzhi sun
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Sep 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Oct 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Oct 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
30 Nov 2020 Author responded Author comments - yingzhi sun
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Nov 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Dec 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
28 Dec 2020 Editorially accepted
3 Feb 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12880-020-00545-5

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page