Skip to main content

Table 2 Targeted attack success rates \(R_{s}\) (%) of targeted UAPs with \(p = 2\) against various DNN models to each target class

From: Universal adversarial attacks on deep neural networks for medical image classification

Model architecture/target class

Skin lesions

OCT

Chest X-ray

NV

MEL

NM

CNV

NORMAL

PNEUMONIA

Inception V3

93.3 (65.6)

94.4 (12.2)

84.1 (25.7)

95.9 (24.8)

96.1 (52.8)

93.3 (47.2)

VGG16

89.6 (71.7)

40.4 (8.3)

32.4 (25.4)

97.7 (24.9)

95.6 (50.2)

95.0 (49.8)

VGG19

91.6 (72.1)

64.6 (8.7)

41.2 (25.9)

97.5 (24.9)

97.6 (51.7)

95.2 (48.3)

ResNet50

97.9 (66.5)

92.4 (11.8)

84.9 (25.8)

98.5 (24.5)

95.7 (53.5)

95.2 (46.5)

Inception ResNet V2

92.4 (61.0)

97.3 (16.1)

84.5 (25.6)

96.2 (24.7)

98.3 (53.1)

93.9 (46.9)

DenseNet 121

92.1 (65.2)

90.5 (13.4)

41.8 (25.3)

88.1 (24.7)

94.8 (51.9)

92.0 (48.1)

DenseNet 169

92.9 (65.8)

92.9 (12.2)

41.7 (25.0)

92.7 (24.2)

95.7 (52.0)

93.1 (48.0)

  1. \(R_{s}\) was for test images, \(\zeta = 2\%\) for the skin lesions and chest X-ray image datasets, and \(\zeta = 6\%\) for the OCT image dataset. Values in brackets are \(R_{s}\) of random UAPs (random controls)