Skip to main content

Table 1 Fooling rates \(R_{f}\) (%) of nontargeted UAPs against various DNN models for test images of skin lesions, OCT, and chest X-ray image datasets

From: Universal adversarial attacks on deep neural networks for medical image classification

Model architecture

Skin lesions

OCT

Chest X-ray

\(p = 2\)

\(p = \infty\)

\(p = 2\)

\(p = \infty\)

\(p = 2\)

\(p = \infty\)

Inception V3

92.2 (14.1)

90.0 (11.8)

70.2 (1.0)

73.9 (3.4)

81.7 (2.4)

79.8 (3.0)

VGG16

87.6 (4.9)

86.4 (3.5)

72.4 (0.2)

74.9 (1.8)

49.8 (2.2)

50.0 (2.2)

VGG19

89.2 (5.2)

87.0 (3.7)

72.8 (0.4)

74.7 (2.1)

49.3 (3.9)

49.3 (4.4)

ResNet50

91.9 (11.6)

87.9 (10.1)

71.2 (1.1)

74.8 (5.4)

72.6 (7.2)

73.0 (7.4)

Inception ResNet V2

94.5 (16.7)

90.3 (15.2)

69.6 (1.4)

74.0 (3.2)

78.0 (2.6)

77.0 (3.3)

DenseNet 121

93.8 (12.0)

82.9 (10.2)

68.8 (1.3)

73.0 (3.6)

69.8 (3.9)

71.7 (4.1)

DenseNet 169

93.8 (11.7)

84.2 (9.1)

50.3 (1.3)

72.3 (4.0)

67.6 (2.8)

71.3 (3.7)

  1. \(\zeta = 4\%\) for the skin lesions and chest X-ray image datasets. \(\zeta = 6\%\) for the OCT image dataset. Values in brackets are \(R_{f}\) of random UAPs (random controls)