Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic clinical features and volumetric data of each group. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation

From: Rotation and torsion of the left ventricle with cardiovascular magnetic resonance tagging: comparison of two analysis methods

Parameter

HCM N = 14

Mutation N = 10

Healthy N = 12

p-value

Number of females (proportion)

4 (25%)

10 (100%)

8 (75%)

Age (years)

43 ± 11

34 ± 13

43 ± 17

0.280

Height (cm)

177 ± 9

166 ± 4

169 ± 9

0.015*

Weight (kg)

80 ± 15

60 ± 3

79 ± 11

0.005*

BSA (m2)

2.0 ± 0.7

1.7 ± 0.0

1.8 ± 0.3

0.003*

LVEF (%)

63 ± 8

62 ± 6

60 ± 9

0.225

LVEDVI (ml/ m2)

81 ± 11

77 ± 13

79 ± 12

0.819

LVESVI (ml/ m2)

30 ± 10

29 ± 7

32 ± 11

0.625

LVMI (g/ m2)

60 ± 18

42 ± 7

42 ± 8

0.005*

Max LV wall thickness (mm)

22 ± 7

9 ± 1

10 ± 3

< 0.0001*

Distance between tagging planes (cm)

4.0 ± 0.5

3.9 ± 0.3

3.7 ± 0.2

0.098

  1. BMI Body mass index, BSA Body surface area, LV Left-ventricle, EF Ejection fraction, EDVI End-diastolic volume indexed, ESVI End-systolic volume indexed, MI Mass indexed, * statistically significant (p < 0.050)