Peer Review reports
From: Image quality and pathology assessment in CT Urography: when is the low-dose series sufficient?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Apr 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Apr 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek |
| 22 May 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ankur Goyal |
| 23 May 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dominik Spinczyk |
| 1 Jun 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ernest Ekpo |
| 15 Jun 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Bharti Kataria |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 15 Jun 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 4 Jul 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dominik Spinczyk |
| 7 Jul 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ernest Ekpo |
| 26 Jul 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Bharti Kataria |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 Jul 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 Jul 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Aug 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12880-019-0363-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.