Skip to main content

Table 2 Test-retest reproducibility analysis of tagging and 2D/3D CMR-TT

From: 2D/3D CMR tissue tracking versus CMR tagging in the assessment of spontaneous T2DM rhesus monkeys with isolated diastolic dysfunction

Total study group (n = 19)

Intraclass correlation coefficient (95% CI)

Bland-Altman analysis

Mean bias (%)

LOA

Tagging

 Ecc (%)

0.83** (0.32/0.96)

1.30

−3.90/6.40

 tEcc (s)

0.96** (0.82/0.99)

0.01

−0.03/0.05

 CSR (%/s)

0.92** (0.64/0.98)

−4.30

−48.70/40.00

 Ell (%)

0.73* (−0.03/0.94)

1.10

−2.10/4.40

 tEll (s)

0.93** (0.71/0.98)

0.01

−0.04/0.05

 LSR (%/s)

0.66*(−0.20/0.92)

−13.60

−61.10/33.80

2D CMR-TT

 Ecc (%)

0.77* (−0.01/0.95)

1.70

−5.40/8.80

 tEcc (s)

0.53 (−1.58/0.90)

0.00

−0.06/0.06

 CSR (%/s)

0.86** (0.36/0.97)

−21.70

−99.90/56.50

 Ell (%)

0.90** (0.55/0.98)

1.60

−2.50/5.60

 tEll (s)

0.31 (−2.07/0.84)

0.04

−0.12/0.19

 LSR (%/s)

0.87** (0.43/0.97)

−31.10

−88.60/26.40

3D CMR-TT

 Ecc (%)

0.62 (−0.66/0.91)

1.30

−7.50/10.10

 tEcc (s)

0.84** (0.27/0.97)

0.00

−0.04/0.05

 CSR (%/s)

0.71 (−0.18/0.93)

−20.20

− 133.00/92.50

 Ell (%)

0.77* (0.05/0.95)

0.90

−4.50/6.30

 tEll (s)

−0.28 (−3.43/0.69)

− 0.02

−0.08/0.05

 LSR (%/s)

0.26 (−1.52/0.83)

−22.90

− 118.6/72.80

  1. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05