Skip to main content

Table 7 Performance comparison of the state-of-the-art methods and our method

From: Classification of lung nodules in CT scans using three-dimensional deep convolutional neural networks with a checkpoint ensemble method

 

Method

0.125

0.25

0.5

1

2

4

8

CPM

LUNA16CAD

2D CNN

0.113

0.165

0.265

0.465

0.596

0.695

0.785

0.440

LungNess

2D CNN

0.453

0.535

0.591

0.635

0.696

0.741

0.797

0.635

iitem03

2D CNN

0.394

0.491

0.570

0.660

0.732

0.795

0.851

0.642

[22]

3D CNN

0.517

0.602

0.720

0.788

0.822

0.839

0.856

0.735

LUNA16CAD

3D CNN

0.640

0.698

0.750

0.804

0.847

0.874

0.897

0.787

[9]

2D CNN

0.734

0.744

0.763

0.796

0.824

0.832

0.834

0.790

DIAG_CONVNET [23]

3D CNN

0.636

0.727

0.792

0.844

0.876

0.905

0.916

0.814

UACNN

2D CNN

0.655

0.745

0.807

0.849

0.880

0.907

0.925

0.824

CUMedVis [24]

3D CNN

0.677

0.737

0.815

0.848

0.879

0.907

0.922

0.827

D48

3D CNN

0.676

0.765

0.839

0.894

0.922

0.938

0.953

0.855

ESB-ALL

3D CNN

0.720

0.842

0.914

0.954

0.974

0.982

0.982

0.910