Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics and mean DAPs, EDs, and ED to DAP ratios

From: Investigations of organ and effective doses of abdominal cone-beam computed tomography during transarterial chemoembolization using Monte Carlo simulation

 

Patient number (Male / Female)

Age

Height (cm)

Weight (kg)

DAP (Gy·cm2)

ED (mSv)

ED to DAP ratio (mSv·Gy−1·cm− 2)

All patients

80 (56/24)

65 ± 12 (36–87)

162 ± 8 (146–183)

67 ± 13 (48–120)

12.9 ± 0.8 (11.8–17.1)

3.5 ± 0.5 (2.1–4.5)

0.27 ± 0.04 (0.17–0.35)

 BMI < 25 kg/m2

45 (30/15)

68 ± 11 (37–87)

161 ± 7 (148–176)

59 ± 6 (48–76)

12.9 ± 0.6 (12.3–15.4)

3.8 ± 0.3 (3.0–4.5)

0.29 ± 0.02 (0.24–0.35)

 BMI 25–30 kg/m2

22 (18/4)

62 ± 12 (40–83)

163 ± 7 (146–173)

72 ± 7 (58–86)

12.8 ± 0.6 (11.8–14.8)

3.3 ± 0.4 (2.7–4.2)

0.26 ± 0.02 (0.22–0.30)

 BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2

13 (8/5)

60 ± 13 (36–83)

163 ± 8 (148–183)

85 ± 13 (68–120)

13.2 ± 1.4 (11.9–17.1)

3.0 ± 0.4 (2.1–3.9)

0.23 ± 0.03 (0.17–0.28)

  1. Data are mean ± SD (range)