Table 5 Directly taking the refined LPM, i.e., up to Section “Step 4): LPM refinement”) of the proposed method, for performance evaluation, under different γ
From: Automated lesion detection on MRI scans using combined unsupervised and supervised methods
γ | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | Dice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\frac {1}{6}\) | 0.976±0.012 | 0.470±0.197 | 0.611±0.154 | 0.516±0.178 |
\(\frac {2}{6}\) | 0.978±0.012 | 0.510±0.194 | 0.624±0.151 | 0.550±0.174 |
\(\frac {3}{6}\) | 0.979±0.011 | 0.550±0.189 | 0.631±0.148 | 0.582±0.169 |
\(\frac {4}{6}\) | 0.980±0.011 | 0.600±0.186 | 0.634±0.143 | 0.612±0.166 |
\(\frac {5}{6}\) | 0.981±0.012 | 0.665±0.183 | 0.671±0.140 | 0.663±0.161 |
1 | 0.981±0.012 | 0.645±0.187 | 0.590±0.157 | 0.611±0.166 |