Skip to main content

Table 3 The performance of the unsupervised component only and the performance of the proposed method (combining both unsupervised and supervised components)when using different features for supervised training

From: Automated lesion detection on MRI scans using combined unsupervised and supervised methods

Unsupervised classification

  
  

Accuracy

Precision

Recall

Dice

  

0.981±0.012

0.665±0.183

0.671±0.140

0.663±0.161

Supervised classification

  

Inputs

Classifiers

Accuracy

Precision

Recall

Dice

T1 MRI

zero-order

0.952±0.015

0.150±0.313

0.402±0.203

0.202±0.302

 

1st-order

0.957±0.014

0.162±0.306

0.389±0.241

0.214±0.301

 

2nd-order

0.954±0.015

0.144±0.347

0.377±0.272

0.193±0.342

 

All combined

0.956±0.014

0.187±0.291

0.421±0.198

0.258±0.291

Prob. maps

zero-order

0.981±0.012

0.696±0.178

0.637±0.146

0.665±0.164

of WM, GM

1st-order

0.981±0.012

0.702±0.177

0.621±0.157

0.659±0.166

external CSF, LPM

2nd-order

0.968±0.013

0.503±0.192

0.609±0.159

0.551±0.173

 

All combined

0.983±0.012

0.781±0.144

0.681±0.142

0.728±0.112

T1 MRI & prob.

zero-order

0.983±0.011

0.747±0.151

0.646±0.145

0.681±0.143

maps of WM, GM,

1st-order

0.983±0.011

0.754±0.149

0.649±0.142

0.687±0.144

external CSF, LPM

2nd-order

0.970±0.012

0.526±0.170

0.641±0.152

0.547±0.160

 

All combined

0.983±0.011

0.783±0.143

0.685±0.131

0.731±0.106