Table 5 Estimated parameters, Goodness-of-fit statistics and dose reduction of GWrank
From: Regression models for analyzing radiological visual grading studies – an empirical comparison
Model | Coefficient | Goodness-of-fit | Dose Reduction | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
logCTDI | id2 | id4 | AIC | Pseudo R2 | id2 | id4 | ||||
Est. | P-value | Est. | P-value | Est. | P-value | |||||
regressa | 4.482 | <0.001 | 0.850 | <0.001 | 0.696 | <0.001 | - | 0.0959 | 17.27 % | 14.38 % |
(3.981, 4.983) | (0.673, 1.027) | (0.518, 0.873) | (14.44 %, 20.11 %) | (11.44 %, 17.32 %) | ||||||
ologita | 9.247 | <0.001 | 1.780 | <0.001 | 1.531 | <0.001 | 2462.68 | 0.1138 | 17.51 % | 15.26 % |
(8.126, 10.368) | (1.428, 2.132) | (1.168, 1.894) | (14.99 %, 20.02 %) | (12.51 %, 18.01 %) | ||||||
rologita | 5.537 | <0.001 | 1.232 | <0.001 | 0.932 | <0.001 | 1303.66 | 0.1493 | 19.95 % | 15.49 % |
(4.734, 6.340) | (0.969, 1.495) | (0.666, 1.197) | (17.06 %, 22.84 %) | (12.24 %, 18.74 %) | ||||||
mixedb | 4.482 | <0.001 | 0.850 | <0.001 | 0.696 | <0.001 | 2670.66 | 0.0000 | 17.27 % | 14.38 % |
(3.995, 4.970) | (0.677, 1.023) | (0.523, 0.869) | (14.51 %, 20.04 %) | (11.51 %, 17.24 %) | ||||||
meologitb | 9.267 | <0.001 | 1.751 | <0.001 | 1.549 | <0.001 | 2452.89 | 0.0320 | 17.22 % | 15.40 % |
(8.991, 9.543) | (1.416, 2.086) | (1.214, 1.885) | (14.36 %, 20.07 %) | (12.43 %, 18.36 %) | ||||||