Table 3 Bias in absolute measures and percentage difference
Comparison | Absolute | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
2D before and after 4D (Fig. 2) | −2 ± 6 ml | −1 ± 7 % |
5ch Resp(+) 4D SV vs 2D SV (Fig. 3) | −10 ± 12 ml | −10 ± 11 % |
5ch Resp(−) 4D SV vs 2D SV (Fig. 3) | −13 ± 12 ml | −14 ± 12 % |
32ch Resp(−) 4D SV vs 2D SV (Fig. 3) | −12 ± 14 ml | −12 ± 13 % |
PT Resp(+) vs PT Resp(−) (Fig. 4) | 0 ± 9 ml | 2 ± 12 % |
5ch Resp(+) PT Inflow vs Outflow (Fig. 5) | 7 ± 9 ml | 8 ± 9 % |
5ch Resp(−) PT Inflow vs Outflow (Fig. 5) | 13 ± 12 ml | 17 ± 16 % |
32ch Resp(−) PT Inflow vs Outflow (Fig. 5) | 8 ± 11 ml | 8 ± 10 % |
32ch Resp(−) vs planimetric SV (Fig. 6) | −4 ± 18 ml | −8 ± 23 % |
5ch Resp(−) vs 5ch Resp(+) mean KE (Fig. 8) | 0.1 ± 0.2 mJ | 4 ± 12 % |
5ch Resp(−) vs 5ch Resp(+) KE peak values (Fig. 8) | 0.1 ± 0.8 mJ | 1 ± 17 % |
Vortex volume Resp(−) vs Resp(+) (Fig. 9) | −3 ± 9 ml | −4 ± 13 % |
4D SV 32ch Resp(−) vs 5ch Resp(−) (Fig. 10) | 2 ± 7 ml | 2 ± 8 % |