Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Percent label agreement as a function of the number of atlases

From: Mindboggle: Automated brain labeling with multiple atlases

A All subjects σ II Group 1 σ II Group 2 σ II
1 74.39 (3.90) 0.20 79.05 (1.06) 0.17 73.55 (2.43) 0.21
2 73.75 (2.81) 0.21 78.38 (1.32) 0.18 72.68 (2.07) 0.21
3 76.54 (2.93) 0.19 80.19 (1.42) 0.17 75.30 (2.00) 0.20
4 77.73 (2.78) 0.18 80.95 (1.43) 0.16 76.31 (1.40) 0.19
5 77.88 (2.67) 0.18 81.98 (1.39) 0.15 77.24 (1.83) 0.19
6 78.30 (2.52) 0.18 81.58 (1.42) 0.16 77.45 (1.66) 0.18
7 78.56 (2.75) 0.18 82.09 (1.37) 0.15 77.76 (1.78) 0.18
8 78.67 (2.86) 0.18 82.21 (1.28) 0.15 77.87 (1.93) 0.18
9 79.18 (2.59) 0.17 82.50 (1.20) 0.15 78.15 (1.94) 0.18
10 78.91 (2.60) 0.17       
11 79.25 (2.75) 0.17       
12 79.47 (2.78) 0.17       
13 79.47 (2.86) 0.17       
14 79.41 (2.84) 0.17       
15 79.41 (2.83) 0.17       
16 79.48 (2.57) 0.17       
17 79.59 (2.74) 0.17       
18 79.61 (2.76) 0.17       
19 79.62 (2.74) 0.17       
  1. Percent label agreements and type II errors (II) are given for each number of atlases (A) used to label subject group 1, group 2, and all subjects. The accompanying graph is in Figure 6. Standard deviations are in parentheses (for type II errors, σ equals 0.02 for all subjects and 0.01 for groups 1 and 2).