Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of different desired ROI locations of virtual temperature sensor 2

From: Intelligent neonatal monitoring based on a virtual thermal sensor

NIRT datasets/infant

Tracked regions

Total desired ROI/region

Desired ROI (fitting and tracked)

False ROI (misallocated)

Scoring percentage %

Infant 1

Facial

4

3

1

75

Abdominal

6

4

2

66.6

Upper limb

4

3

1

60

Lower limb

5

5

0

100

Infant 2 (radiant warmer)

Facial

4

2

2

50

Abdominal

6

4

2

66.6

Upper limb

5

4

1

75

Lower limb

5

4

1

75

Infant 3 (radiant warmer)

Facial

4

4

0

100

Abdominal

6

5

1

83.3

Upper limb

5

5

0

100

Lower limb

5

4

1

80

Infant 4 (radiant warmer)

Facial

4

3

1

75

Abdominal

6

5

1

83.3

Upper limb

5

4

1

80

Lower limb

5

3

2

60

Infant 5

Facial

4

3

1

75

Abdominal

6

4

2

66.6

Upper limb

5

3

2

60

Lower limb

5

4

1

80

Infant 6

Facial

4

4

0

100

Abdominal

5

5

0

83.3

Upper limb

5

3

2

60

Lower limb

5

3

2

60

Infant 7

Facial

4

2

2

50

Abdominal

6

3

3

50

Upper limb

5

4

1

80

Lower limb

5

3

2

60

  1. 2This table gives the quantitative index for the total numbers of fitted ROIs and missed ROIs over the total number of these selected ROIs for different spatial positions over neonate’s body.