Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of scoring rate success for VIRSENS in NIRT imaging 1

From: Intelligent neonatal monitoring based on a virtual thermal sensor

Frame no.

Success rate (%)

Data-over flow time (ms)

Tracked anatomical region

p = error rate

Correlation coeff.

1

82

1,200

Face-hand/belly

0.0037

0.235

2

74

1,403

Face-hand/belly

0.0022

0.171

3

80

1,227

Face-hand

0.0015

0.217

4

79

1,296

Face-hand/belly

0.0023

0.182

5

85

1,372

Face-hand

0.0012

0.302

6

86

1,214

Face-hand/belly

0.0031

0.319

7

87.2

1,306

Face/hand

0.0024

0.479

8

82

1,278

Face/hand/belly

0.0027

0.466

9

89.02

1,282

Face-hand/belly

0.0018

0.502

10

88.5

1,307

Face/hand

0.0023

0.412

  1. The table also illustrates the correlation of the tracked ROI descriptor over the measurement scene with respect to a newly chosen position of the ROI descriptor.
  2. 1The table presents the comparison of different success rates for the virtual temperature sensor used within the NIRT imaging for illustrating the scoring percentage of fitted and tracked ROI over the misallocated ones.