Table 4 Study form for reviewers’ results (per lesion base)
Study number: | Reviewer number: | |
|---|---|---|
Score | Definition | Explanation |
1 | Normal | Confident that no tumor recurrence is present in the ablation zone/confident that no new intrahepatic lesions are present |
2 | Probably benign | The appearance of the ablated lesion is compatible with post-ablational inflammation or rim-like characteristics/the new lesions diagnosed do not appear malignant |
3 | Equivocal | There is doubt whether the enhanced FDG, CT- and/or MRI features indicate tumor progression or inflammation/there is doubt whether the new lesions diagnosed are benign or malignant |
4 | Probably malignant | Confident of local progression in the ablation zone/confident of new intrahepatic metastases |
Size or estimated size: | ||
Location: | ||
Intensity FDG vs normal liver; slight/moderate/intense | ||
5 | Impaired quality | Quality of the images precludes adequate diagnosis |
Comments: | ||