Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Sullivan |
| 7 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Innes |
| 28 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Caroline Boulocher |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 28 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 2 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Caroline Boulocher |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 2 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 1 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Innes |
| 23 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Sullivan |
| 26 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Caroline Boulocher |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 26 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 11 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Caroline Boulocher |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 11 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| 6 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Caroline Boulocher |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 6 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2342-10-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.