Skip to main content
Figure 3 | BMC Medical Imaging

Figure 3

From: Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT underestimates left ventricular volumes and shows high variability compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging -- a comparison of four different commercial automated software packages

Figure 3

The absolute difference between MPS and MR imaging for EDV, ESV, SV and LVEF compared to MR imaging and the corresponding MPS program, respectively, for QGS, MyoMetrix, ECTb and Exini, respectively. Note that for most of the measures and programs used, there is a systematic trend in the difference between MPS and MR imaging over the range of values when MR imaging is on the horizontal axis, but this is not apparent when MPS is on the horizontal axis. This implies that there are systematic differences between MR imaging and MPS, and these can not be adjusted for when one only has LV volume values from MPS

Back to article page